Re: Patch: Prevent crit error being loggged on delete of non-existent file

2013-11-19 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
Steven Hartland schreef op 19/11/13 18:36: - Original Message - From: "Maxim Dounin" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 4:52 PM Subject: Re: Patch: Prevent crit error being loggged on delete of non-existent file Hello! On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:43:54PM -, Steven Hartland wr

Re: JSON configuration APIs for NGINX

2013-09-24 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
No. Nginx doesn't do anything with dynamic configuration or JSON. Write some logic that stores the config files and then run 'nginx -s reload'. Works for me, just avoid doing it too often. Tom > On 25 sep. 2013, at 06:25, Myla John-B22173 wrote: > > Hi, > > Are there any JSON APIs defined

Re: Dead code in accept

2013-08-05 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
Frankly, I don't see the need. We're talking about eliminating 4 or 5 CPU instructions per accept() call which only seems relevant if that's the only thing nginx does: but with HTTP pipelining this optimization is very insignificant as that already reduces the amount of accept() calls a lot. Als

Re: [PATCH] SO_REUSEPORT support for listen sockets

2013-07-26 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
You might want to add some checks to ensure compilation doesn't fail on platforms that don't define the constant, such as Windows. Tom > On 26 jul. 2013, at 10:07, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have the following preliminary patch to enable SO_REUSEPORT feature > on listen socke

Re: [PATCH] DragonFlyBSD KEEPALIVE_TUNABLE

2013-07-25 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
Hi, Wouldn't a better place for this patch be the configure script instead of hardcoding the values? Tom > On 25 jul. 2013, at 03:32, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> On 7/24/13 5:42 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: >>> Hi, >>>

Re: Request: upstream via a SOCKS proxy

2013-01-25 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
= --- auto/modules(revision 5017) +++ auto/modules(working copy) @@ -365,6 +365,11 @@ HTTP_SRCS="$HTTP_SRCS $HTTP_UPSTREAM_KEEPALIVE_SRCS" fi +if [ $HTTP_UPSTREAM_SOCKS = YES ]; then +have=NGX_HTTP_UPSTREAM_SOCKS .

Re: Request: upstream via a SOCKS proxy

2013-01-25 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
l protocol, imho. I Agree with you that this would be a nice upsteam module, even that I don't need it at the moment. Cheers Aleks Am 23-01-2013 17:05, schrieb Tom van der Woerdt: Hi, A project I'm working on has a backend server that, for security reasons, can only be accessed vi

Re: Request: upstream via a SOCKS proxy

2013-01-25 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
similar with the tcp proxy module? https://github.com/yaoweibin/nginx_tcp_proxy_module 2013/1/24 Tom van der Woerdt mailto:i...@tvdw.eu>> Hi, A project I'm working on has a backend server that, for security reasons, can only be accessed via a SOCKS4a/SOCKS5 proxy. A

Request: upstream via a SOCKS proxy

2013-01-23 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
} As far as I'm aware, this feature wouldn't break anything, since a SOCKS connections behaves just like any other normal socket. Thanks for considering, Tom van der Woerdt ___ nginx-devel mailing list nginx-devel@nginx.org http://