Re: build failed on Linux with x32 ABI

Hello! On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 07:32:04PM +0300, Serguei I. Ivantsov wrote: > >> +#if (NGX_HAVE_RTSIG) > >> +#include > >> +#endif > >> + > >> > >> #if (NGX_HAVE_POSIX_SEM) > >> #include > > >This probably needs to be moved to other event method related > >conditional includes > > I did not

Re: API question: large data processing handler

Hello! On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:03:38AM -0600, Julien Zefi wrote: > hi, > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:42:57PM -0600, Julien Zefi wrote: > > > > > i tried to follow the suggestion of using a timer and a new handler

build failed on Linux with x32 ABI

>> +#if (NGX_HAVE_RTSIG) >> +#include >> +#endif >> + >> >> #if (NGX_HAVE_POSIX_SEM) >> #include >This probably needs to be moved to other event method related >conditional includes I did not find an example how and where conditionally include system header. BTW, I just make the same way I fo

Re: SPDY: what is the purpose of blocked frame

On Tuesday 25 June 2013 12:51:17 Yury Kirpichev wrote: > Hi Nginx Developers, > > > Could someone explain what is the purpose to use blocked frame for > SYN_REPLY frame in spdy implementation? > > According to our investigation it makes it impossible to use spdy > priorities because of blocked f

Re: Why nginx's http parser doesnt use regular expressions?

On Tuesday 25 June 2013 08:11:54 anshuk kumar wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I have another question, was any state machine generators like ragel used > to code this or this is completely hand written? > [..] It's all written by hand. We don't use generators. wbr, Valentin V. Bartenev __

SPDY: what is the purpose of blocked frame

Hi Nginx Developers, Could someone explain what is the purpose to use blocked frame for SYN_REPLY frame in spdy implementation? According to our investigation it makes it impossible to use spdy priorities because of blocked frames (since each stream is started with SYN_REPLY which is blocked the

Re: API question: large data processing handler

hi, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Maxim Dounin wrote: > Hello! > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:42:57PM -0600, Julien Zefi wrote: > > > i tried to follow the suggestion of using a timer and a new handler for > the > > write callback without luck, indeed there is something wrong on my end. > >