Re: status-line trailing SP is missing ?

Hello! On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 03:45:18PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > On 29 Aug 2023, at 08:14, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 04:21:07PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> https://bugs.debian.org/1050571 > >> reports that the Status li

Re: status-line trailing SP is missing ?

Hello! On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 03:45:06PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > On 31 Aug 2023, at 14:28, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 04:20:15PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > > >>> On 29 Aug 2023, at 08:33, Maxim Dounin wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug

Re: status-line trailing SP is missing ?

> On 29 Aug 2023, at 08:14, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > Hello! > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 04:21:07PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> https://bugs.debian.org/1050571 >> reports that the Status line doesn't always end with space, which seems >> contradictory to RFC9112 which states: >> "A

Re: status-line trailing SP is missing ?

> On 31 Aug 2023, at 14:28, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > Hello! > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 04:20:15PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > >>> On 29 Aug 2023, at 08:33, Maxim Dounin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:59:28PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >>> > On 26 Aug 2023, at 18:21,

Re: status-line trailing SP is missing ?

Hello! On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 04:20:15PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > On 29 Aug 2023, at 08:33, Maxim Dounin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:59:28PM +0400, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > > >>> On 26 Aug 2023, at 18:21, Jérémy Lal wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> https://bugs