t; they are mutually consistent?
If you go to http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/ you will
find that the first half of the listed builds are "-jsoff-" and the
second half are "-json-"
Scroll right down to the bottom to find the most recent json build.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
The point is that some people choose to
> use the stable releases, instead of the development builds. This
> discussion had its origin in a post to csa.apps by someone who had
> downloaded NetSurf 3.0 and was 'having some difficulty with its JS'.
Oops.
Eggs. Sucking. Grandmother. Dont teach. ;-(
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <5353116372t...@netsurf-browser.org>
on 28 May 2013 Michael Drake wrote:
> Actually, I'd recommend simply deleting your old Choices file.
I take it you mean this file:
!Boot.Choices.WWW.NetSurf.Choices
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
n confirm that I have installed version 1964 today and that it does
> fix my problem.
I've installed CI #1965 and it has fixed the BoxConvert problem I had
with an email attachment with 1959. It's also got rid of the "Not
enough application memory to start Basic" error that 1959 gave when
the desktop was starting.
> Well done and thanks to all of you.
Agreed
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
Cache resource, which
wsa the main change in !Boot due to #1959?
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <20140613143931.gp3...@platypus.pepperfish.net>
on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:32:26PM +0100, Bob Latham wrote:
>> In article ,
>>Andrew Pinder wrote:
>>> I've been getting this error when the desktop starts si
In message <20140613221516.gc1...@platypus.pepperfish.net>
on 13 Jun 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:42:54PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>>> Couple people try moving it elsewhere (ie, outside !Boot.Resources), and
>>> configure !Boot to "l
7;t checked it actually worked.)
If you give some clues as to how to test it, some of us may be able to
give feedback :-)
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
immediately. Could this be the source of
the problem?
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message
on 14 Jun 2014 Andrew Pinder wrote:
> In message
> on 14 Jun 2014 Steve Fryatt wrote:
>> I don't run NetSurf during the boot sequence -- are all the people seeing
>> issues doing that? What are people's Next slots configured to during the
>>
it if the datestamps could be preserved so it doesn't
appear to be updated.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <20140926130057.gi20...@platypus.pepperfish.net>
on 26 Sep 2014 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:46:56PM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
>> Rob Kendrick wrote on 26 Sep:
>>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:20:56AM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>>&g
>> 2. Is it indeed Netsurf that generates the message? If so, it's
>> ironic that I'm using a very recent build, Netsurf #2124.
> No, it's JavaScript.
So there's a downside to NetSurf having acquired JS support ;-)
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
ossible that NetSurf can't yet handle the link. It
it will be of help I can add it to the bug tracker.
I'm running NetSurf on an ARMini with RO5.20. This error occurs with
both NetSurf 2311 and 2381.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
zilla connects, or similar. Not at lot we can
> do.
Ah, thanks. This made me try the GR homepage - same error. Module =
WindsorModule.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
y be so quick that you don't notice it. So maybe a recent
change slowed that down.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <5479b57ad5bbai...@argonet.co.uk>
on 21 Dec 2014 Brian wrote:
> In article ,
>Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> In message <54797458f6bbai...@argonet.co.uk>
>> on 21 Dec 2014 Brian wrote:
>>> NetSurf has very recently started scanning fonts durin
write speed of one Megabit (120kilobytes/
> second) the cache will disable itself and display a warning.
I'm finding this on my ARMini. Is this common?
Presumably using !Cache on a RAM disc would be a waste of time as
stuff would not be saved when the computer was turned off.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <54a544aeb4stuartli...@orpheusinternet.co.uk>
on 16 Mar 2015 lists wrote:
> In article <549f1fa454.andrew-...@waitrose.com>,
>Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> I'm finding this on my ARMini. Is this common?
> I also see it from time to time on my ARMX6 an
umentation/progress.html
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
sted on the support web pages.
I do recall having a conversation with one of the developers at the
Wakefield show, possibly two years ago, who said that one aspect of
providing JS support involved working through a very large number of
"bindings" in order to check they worked correctly.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
ut there, considering some of the
> hype surrounding the disc speed of the ARMX6.
Stuart is reporting values from a version (#2680) before the upgrade
that improves things (after #2696).
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
he.c llcache_finalise 3352: Backing store
average bandwidth 33092 bytes/second
That last line was many more than 20 lines from the end of the file
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
.
You guys are brave - or maybe foolhardy!
Thanks for your efforts so far :-)
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
platform would give
some kind of answer to that question.
BTW, I was at the Wakefield Show and was expecting to donate to the
NetSurf project there as in previous years. Then I realised that none
of the developers were there :-(
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
uk site
was 27269 bytes/second. The previous figure I reported was 33092
bytes/second (NS#2697).
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <019bfbbe54.andrew-...@waitrose.com>
on 5 May 2015 Andrew Pinder wrote:
> In message <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org>
> on 5 May 2015 Vincent Sanders wrote:
>> Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
>> disc cache
In message
on 7 May 2015 Andrew Pinder wrote:
> I wonder how stable the measurements are. I've just upgraded this
> ARMini to RO 5.22 so have redone the measurements, still with NS#2771:
> 161126 bytes/second. That's a massive increase. I had visited a
> numbe
n of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <54c085ed15ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>
on 8 May 2015 cj wrote:
> In article <0c9680c054.andrew-...@waitrose.com>,
>Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> I'm curious that there is so much variability!
> Will some of this not be due to the fact that stuff is alr
In message
on 8 May 2015 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 8 May 2015, Andrew Pinder wrote:
> [snip]
>> Which version of NetSurf are we talking about here? I'm on 3.4 (Dev
>> CI #2771) on RO 5.22 and haven't seen any problems with Google.
> Try tuning off JavaScript
t recent one are:
(10335.07) content/fs_backing_store.c finalise 1613: Cache
total/hit/miss/fail (counts) 523/88/435/0 (100%/16%/83%/0%)
(20076.05) content/llcache.c llcache_finalise 3361: Backing store
wrote 577764 bytes in 0 ms average 4530 bytes/second
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message
on 9 May 2015 Andrew Pinder wrote:
> In message <20150508154706.gb2...@kyllikki.org>
> on 8 May 2015 Vincent Sanders wrote:
>> The information I want is contained in the log file at exit as most of
>> you have discovered. I have improved whats reported w
n
> instrumental in helping track down the UNIXLib issue.
Thanks, as always, for your work on NetSurf.
If I understand the position correctly, UnixLib is part of the
development environment you use and isn't part of RISCOS itself? So
once it has been fixed I won't have to install an update on this
machine?
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
ermail/netsurf-dev-netsurf-browser
> .org/2015-August/003749.html
> ...or...
> http://listmaster.pepperfish.net/pipermail/netsurf-users-netsurf-brows
> er.org/2015-August/013219.html
> ...or...
> http://bugs.netsurf-browser.org/mantis/view.php?id=2343
> ...for the background.
And they do want reports of the pages that hang :-)
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
e do apreciate you taking the time.
A couple of pages that come up blank even with JS off:
https://www.ryanair.com/en/questions/photo-id/
https://www.ryanair.com/en/terms-and-conditions/regulations-traveldocumentation/
Build #2962 on ARMini RO 5.22
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
ker proved tricky as it wouldn't upload the log file: "Failed
to open/read local data from file/application". So I'm reporting it
here.
It's a reproducible bug.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
he log file. It
> works every time for me. I did it just now with CI#3000.
Maybe because I was doing it with NetSurf itself on this ARMini rather
than via a PC?
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <358bb81555.davem...@my.inbox.com>
on 20 Oct 2015 Dave Higton wrote:
> In message
> Peter Young wrote:
>>On 20 Oct 2015 Harriet Bazley
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 Oct 2015 as I do recall,
>>> Andrew Pin
In message
on 20 Oct 2015 Dave Higton wrote:
> Netsurf CI version #3001 (freshly cooked!) fixes bug 2367. NS should
> now crash on rather less sites.
> I claim no credit.
Indeed it does now load teh page rather than crashing. Thanks :-)
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
es in !Boot.Choices.WWW.NetSurf ? That strikes
me as a possible place for a problem to be located that clearly isn't
in the actual application.
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message
on 25 Aug 2016 Andrew Pinder wrote:
> I've just reported to the bug tracker that NetSurf is now refusing to
> load and exiting with a Segmentation fault. I have been running CI #
> 3625 since 9 Aug without any problems before this morning. Reverting
> to #3594 giv
In message <20160826091352.gp26...@platypus.pepperfish.net>
on 26 Aug 2016 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:21:52PM +0100, Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> There appear to be 106 URLs in there. I'm not going to test each one
>> to find where the problem is.
&
In message
on 4 Nov 2017 Dave Higton wrote:
> Did I miss an announcement of the release of 3.7, or is it still not
> released?
Build #4210 declares itself to be version 3.7.
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
has been corrupted. How do I
check? Where do I find an up to date version of Unicode to install?
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
In message <57895fcbc1ron.bris...@blueyonder.co.uk>
on 20 Feb 2019 Ron Briscoe wrote:
> In article <56b3fc8857.andrew-...@waitrose.com>,
>Andrew Pinder wrote:
>> My best guess is that a Unicode file has been corrupted. How do I
>> check? Where do I find an
em to merge.
> Have the various cache files, which reside in Scrap (IIRC), been deleted? I
> have a recollation of corrupt Unicode cache (RUFL) data preventing the
> browser from starting.
Thanks, Steve, that has solved the problem :-)
Regards
Andrew
--
Andrew Pinder
47 matches
Mail list logo
