http://www.magheragenealogy.org/
Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf.
It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher!
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats
and more!
In article <56d587af09li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
> http://www.magheragenealogy.org/
> Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf.
> It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher!
It is. The >26 tags would beg to differ.
The best result from a
In article <56d58e70b8...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <56d587af09li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists)
> wrote:
> > http://www.magheragenealogy.org/
> > Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf.
> > It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher!
Richard Torrens wrote:
>> It is not a J/S thing. But the html is terrible to decipher!
Tim Hill wrote on 8 Mar:
> It is. The >26 tags would beg to differ.
Would be nice to add a colour for ... to the HTML
mode in StrongEd so that JS would immediately jump out at you in a
page where "the html
In article <56d59185celi...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
[Snip]
> The page still does not display properly - so as I said, it is not a
> J/S thing!
If you say so.
--
Tim Hill
timil.com : tjrh.eu : butterwick.eu : blue-bike.uk : youngtheatre.co.uk
On 2018-03-08 12:58, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
In article <56d58e70b8...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
In article <56d587af09li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
> http://www.magheragenealogy.org/
> Most of of the page's text does not display in Netsurf.
> It is not a
In article , Jim Nagel
wrote:
[Snip]
> Would be nice to add a colour for ... to the HTML
> mode in StrongEd so that JS would immediately jump out at you in a
> page where "the html is terrible to decipher".
A workaround - to make your own scripts stand out - is to put them in
HTML comments per
In article <455569058123901cbf28cd87c0dab...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk>,
Jeremy Nicoll - ml netsurf wrote:
> > The page still does not display properly - so as I said, it is not a
> > J/S
> > thing!
> That does not follow. Maybe the code you removed was essential... and
> that WOULD make it a scr
In article <56d5995dc6...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> With the luxury of a PC at my elbow, I tend to throw recalcitrant pages
> at it rather than try and decipher them. WYSIWYG page design tools, such
> as WordPress used to construct Richard's page
I woul point out that this Richard dos not
In article ,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Would be nice to add a colour for ... to the HTML
> mode in StrongEd so that JS would immediately jump out at you in a
> page where "the html is terrible to decipher".
> I think somebody is working to update that mode but I can't remember
> who. Is it you,
10 matches
Mail list logo