On 26/01/16 07:49, David Pitt wrote:
Currently the Changes page shows #3312 as the latest successful build but
the Downloads page only goes up to #3307 for all builds.
The downloads are still there, but "json" has been removed from the
filenames. http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/?
On 26 Jan 2016 David Pitt wrote:
> Currently the Changes page shows #3312 as the latest successful build but
> the Downloads page only goes up to #3307 for all builds.
> http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/jenkins/job/netsurf/changes
> http://ci.netsurf-browser.org/builds/riscos/
I've just download
Michael Drake, on 26 Jan, wrote:
>
>
> On 26/01/16 07:49, David Pitt wrote:
> > Currently the Changes page shows #3312 as the latest successful build
> > but the Downloads page only goes up to #3307 for all builds.
>
> The downloads are still there, but "json" has been removed from the
> filena
In article <3bc72c4755.davem...@my.inbox.com>,
Dave Higton wrote:
> Please, everybody, download the latest test build (which will,
> of course, change as bugs are found and fixed), give it a good
> thrashing, and get your bug reports in.
A site I use a lot is
http://cpc.farnell.com/
Although
http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/
http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ
Both display very badly. First site all text is hidden. The source is very
over-complicated, so I can't see why.
In message <5547fb845eli...@torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote:
> http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/
> http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programma
> ble/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ
> Both display ve
In message <5547fb845eli...@torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote:
>http://www.catbehaviourist.com/sure-feed-microchip-pet-feeder-review/
>
>http://www.zooplus.co.uk/shop/cats/cat_bowls_feeders/feeders/programmable/479534?gclid=CImfsqu3x8oCFUORGwodHCUFYQ
>
>Both display very b
In article ,
Grahame Parish wrote:
> Not related to the problem with the sites, but I confirm that the
> feeders work very well. We have several cats with different dietary
> requirements.
Thanks - but any other discussion, off-list I think!
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk
In article <145dff4755.ga...@wra1th.plus.com>,
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> I have a useful little Lua script, called noscript, for use with
> StrongED that strips out all the stuff between matching
> and tags. Here it is:
Useful: I have on occasion loked for the tags and deleted everything
between
Gavin Wraith wrote on 26 Jan:
> Using it on the text of the first webpage produces source for a leaner
> webpage that reveals the hidden text. Here is the procedure:
> 1. Page->View Source in NetSurf
> 2. Save to some scrap directory.
> 3. Shift-click to load into StrongED
> 4. Shift-Drag noscrip
It is some years ago that Fred Graute added scriptability
to StrongED, using the 'apply' icon. It enables one to
alter what is displayed in a StrongED window by dragging
a script to that icon.
There are often occasions when one would like to massage
webpages displayed in a browser. At present one
In article <09d3064855@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Have often wished for a similar thing to override bothersome CSS,
> particularly CSS that specifies tiny grey text (which seems to be a
> current fashion among some designers with younger eyes than mine).
... and what about the l
In article ,
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> So many web pages these days are crammed with stuff put in by
> advertisers or third parties which upset the viewing experience,
> or which NetSurf is unable to render properly. The individual
> user is increasingly going to need tools to fight back, with
> w
In message <09d3064855@abbeypress.net>
Jim Nagel wrote:
>Did that on the first web page. Got a security warning from StrongEd
>about "process"; I said "allow always".
>Then "File name '.in' not recognised".
Sounds like !StrongED$ScrapDir has not been set. See the line
Set StrongE
In message <55480e2bfeli...@torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote:
>NS has choices:
>Hide advertisements
>Disable pop-up windows
>Disable JavaScript
>
>These, I would guess, tell it to ignore such content. It is then filtering
>exactly as you seem to want!
These are desirabl
cj wrote on 26 Jan:
> ... and what about the latest issue of Archive where, on page 3 you
> have white text on a light grey background???
Yes; that was bad. The contrast looked fine in the past, and looked
fine this time too on screen, but unfortunately my printshop used a
new printer. Befor
In article <41035cf02c7.007bd...@davehigton.me.uk>,
Dave Higton wrote:
> NetSurf is fully capable of creating bug reports using the Mantis
> issue tracker, including attaching files and adding notes. If
> you have a problem, ask on this list for help.
This morning I went through the proce
Hello,
enabling JS for the atari builds was great :-)
Attached is a screenshot of another testpage from the NetSurf JS
Testsuite.
Things like works fine.
document.getElementById() works, also document.write() works, at least
when called during the rendering phase.
The JS Prime-Test page too
In article <4ee4134855.ga...@wra1th.plus.com>,
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> I seem to remember using a browser on an Acorn machine, many years ago,
> that gave you the option of not displaying images unless you
> specifically clicked on the icon that the browser used to indicate a
> missing image.
Fr
In message <57e4a64755.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>As far as I know javascript should ignore html comments and the
>javascript validator does not flag them as errors
>
> http://www.javascriptlint.com/online_lint.php
My reference suggests that an HTML com
In message <5547e95991stuartli...@orpheusinternet.co.uk>
lists wrote:
>In article <3bc72c4755.davem...@my.inbox.com>,
> Dave Higton wrote:
>> Please, everybody, download the latest test build (which will,
>> of course, change as bugs are found and fixed), give it a good
>> thrashing,
In article ,
Dave Higton wrote:
> Please raise an issue on Mantis.
At around 10 this morning, I went to the bug-tracker site and went through
the process of creating a login - user name, email, catchpa - all went ok
but I'm still waiting for the confirmation email to complete the process!
--
Dave Higton wrote
> In message <57e4a64755.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>
> John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>>As far as I know javascript should ignore html comments and the
>>javascript validator does not flag them as errors
>>
>> http://www.javascriptlint.com/online_lint.php
> My refere
On 26 January 2016 23:58:51 GMT+00:00, John Rickman Iyonix
wrote:
>Dave Higton wrote
>
>> In message <57e4a64755.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>
>> John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>
>>>As far as I know javascript should ignore html comments and the
>>>javascript validator does not flag them
24 matches
Mail list logo
