Harriet Bazley wrote
> On 7 Nov 2015 as I do recall,
> John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>> The problem was introduced between 28/11/2014 and 6/01/2015.
>> (#2398) is fast, (#2509) is slow.
>>
>> If you have any builds between these two it would help to pin it down
>> to just a few potential
Hi,
I notice that a couple of modules in the NetSurf !System up grader are older
than some in my !System Directory.
SharedUnixLibrary (SharedULib) is v1.12 (05 Feb 2011) against
SharedUnixLibrary v1.14 (05 September 2015)
The latter is needed for certain newer apps and of course does not affect
I have not reported this on the bug tracker as it does not affect the running
of NetSurf at all.
The download window in NetSurf is too narrow. That is when downloading a large
zip for instance only the last one or two digits of the downloaded amount are
shown. E.G. 123.45Mb of 36GB shows only the
Ron Briscoe wrote
> I have not reported this on the bug tracker as it does not affect the running
> of NetSurf at all.
> The download window in NetSurf is too narrow. That is when downloading
> a large
> zip for instance only the last one or two digits of the downloaded amount are
> shown. E.G.
In message <9551061f55.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>Thanks for spotting the error in my html Chris, however, As David has
>mentioned in a subsequent post, it is not the whole story.
>I have removed the redundant reference and uploaded the page, but it
>st
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 05:22:18PM +, Ron Briscoe wrote:
>
> Could, would the team upgrade the NetSurf !System upgrader please?
The versions included are the versions we depend on. The !System merge
tool won't overwrite newer versions with older.
B.
