Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if
suitably interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later.
The previous changes switched to using a small number of large files
to hold all the "small" entries
In article <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> This change should be beneficial to RISC OS users as filecore is
> (apparently) dreadful at this kind of usage pattern.
I wonder if this is because RISC OS files are 'defragmented' all the
time - I think I am correct in
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 11:48:46AM +0100, cj wrote:
> In article <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org>,
>Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > This change should be beneficial to RISC OS users as filecore is
> > (apparently) dreadful at this kind of usage pattern.
>
> I wonder if this is because RISC OS
In article <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
> disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if
> suitably interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later.
[snip]
> I would
In message <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org>
on 5 May 2015 Vincent Sanders wrote:
> Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the
> disc cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if
> suitably interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later.
> The
In article <20150505103028.gg19...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> I am especially interested in testing from the Iyonix as this was
> right on the edge of usefulness previously.
Just loaded a few random pages from BBC and from ROOL on the Iyonix.
I did have the disc cache disabled be
Vincent Sanders, on 5 May, wrote:
> Further to my previous efforts I have made an attempt to improve the disc
> cache performance even more. I would again be grateful if suitably
> interested users could try test CI build 2771 or later.
[snip]
> I am especially interested in testing from the Iyo
Using a PandaBoard with the cache on a Fat32 formatted SSD (not the
SD card) gave the following:
(663.19) content/llcache.c llcache_finalise 3361: Backing store
average bandwidth 414186 bytes/second
--
Chris Johnson
