Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-24 Thread John Williams
In article , David Pitt wrote: > Is this the earlier instance:- > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=323&group_id=51719&atid=464312 That's it - and sorry, it was you and not another David! I see this hasn't been corrected, but am delighted to see that the similar e

Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-24 Thread John Williams
On 24 Apr, joh...@ukgateway.net wrote: > I see this hasn't been corrected, Whoops - a quick refresh and it magically has - was I looking at a cached page or what? Congratulations all round! John