In article ,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 5 Nov 2012 as I do recall,
> Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > We held our latest developer workshop this weekend, I have written
> > about it on my blog[1] for those who might be interested in what we got
> > up to.
> >
> > [1]http://vincentsanders.
In message <52ea7bdaaaj...@jaharrison.me.uk>
John Harrison wrote:
>
>> Most of the JS I've ever encountered ...
>
> IME JS is often used to hide e-mail addresses from web crawlers looking for
> spam fodder. Currently such addresses (and sometimes the associated names)
> are invisible
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +, george greenfield wrote:
> Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> test-build titles be meaningful, I wonder ;-)
Indeed.
Until and unless we can get libmozjs ported to RISC OS, it'll be jsoff there
all the time :-(
D.
--
Daniel
In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +, george greenfield wrote:
> > Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> > test-build titles be meaningful, I wonder ;-)
> Indeed.
> Until and unle
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:16:41 + (GMT), Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
>Daniel Silverstone wrote:
>
> > Until and unless we can get libmozjs ported to RISC OS, it'll be jsoff there
> > all the time :-(
>
> I got 1.8 and 1.7 to build for RISC
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 22:16 +, Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
>Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +, george greenfield wrote:
> > > Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> > > test-bu
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:16:41PM +, Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
> > > Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> > > test-build titles be meaningful, I wonder ;-)
> > Indeed.
> > Until and unless we can get libmozjs port
In article <20121107230822.GC2863@somnambulist.local>,
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> We're targetting 1.8.5 I'm afraid.
> We've gotten NSPR building but we're stuck at sorting out mozjs because it
> gets
> confused between the host and the target NSPR installs.
Is that with or without the jit
