On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 07:57 +0100, David J. Ruck wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 18:49, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > * The Continuous Integration (CI) builds are produced for the
> > NetSurf Developers.
>
> In which case to avoid the confusion which has enviably arisen, please
> can information and di
In message <506be1e3.1010...@druck.org.uk>
"David J. Ruck" wrote:
> On 02/10/2012 18:49, Vincent Sanders wrote:
>> * The Continuous Integration (CI) builds are produced for the
>> NetSurf Developers.
> In which case to avoid the confusion which has enviably arisen, please
> can i
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:04:29AM +0100, Alan Leighton wrote:
> Could not put it better David for many of us it is wait for the next,
> for the beta builds, Thanks, Alan
What beta builds? Do you mean the old test builds? These are
essentially the same, except using off-the-shelf better infras
In message
Alan Leighton wrote:
> In message <506be1e3.1010...@druck.org.uk>
> "David J. Ruck" wrote:
>
>> On 02/10/2012 18:49, Vincent Sanders wrote:
>>> * The Continuous Integration (CI) builds are produced for the
>>> NetSurf Developers.
>
>> In which case to avoi
The following bytes were arranged on 2 Oct 2012 by Michael Drake :
> In article <52d877edfdcvj...@waitrose.com>,
>Chris Newman wrote:
>
> > In the info window obtained from the iconbar icon, "Version" just gives
> > 3.0 (development). Is there a way of checking which version/build you
> > are
The following bytes were arranged on 29 Sep 2012 by Martin Bazley :
> http://www.andyfanton.com
>
> "Serious error". Every time, without fail.
With the 2012-10-02_20-23-02 archive, this site has stopped crashing
(again). I haven't had a lockup yet, and I'm hopeful from other
people's reports th
