In message <800994.16379...@web111312.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
WP Blatchley wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well despite Rob Kenricks's probably highly accurate description of
> how development for RISC OS is ("hateful"!), I am interested, and have
> expressed that interest on the developers' mailing li
In article <509c71f91eba...@e-allen.me.uk>,
Barry E Allen wrote:
> Don't be silly. It is not a choice that I have to make. I
> rarely use Netsurf, preferring to use Google Chrome on my
> PeeCee or Firefox on my ASUS EeePC. Why would anyone use
> Netsurf when there are much more capable browser
In article <509ca47aa6rh.li...@phone.coop>, Russell Hafter - Lists
wrote:
> The adverts tend to take much longer to load than the actual data, and
> they also reload frequently. AFAIK the adverts are loaded using
> Javascript, so with NetSuf they do not load.
Many adverts on the Web these days ar
Upon starting Netsurf (Dated 17 September 2008, 21:47 UTC), I receive
the following error: The Unicode font library could not be
initialized.
The error is not specific to this release. I downloaded the latest
version in response to the installed version suddenly generating this
error on start
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 12:47 +0100, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Upon starting Netsurf (Dated 17 September 2008, 21:47 UTC), I receive
> the following error: The Unicode font library could not be
> initialized.
Please email me a relevant Log file, and your !Fonts directory, zipped.
John.
Rob Kendrick a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:34:53 +0100
aw29...@gmail.com wrote:
In all of this, our preference has been for option 1. It would,
however, be remiss of us not to point out the inevitable result of
option 1 not happening (i.e. option 2).
One idea is doing what 99% of
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:58:23 +0100
Tim Hill wrote:
> Are there 500 user of the RISC OS version of NetSurf willing to
> donate £4 a month to support a developer?
>
> www.pledgebank.com/netsurf4riscos
Can I ask what happens if your patches aren't accepted, for whatever
reason?
This is why we've
