Paul Stewart wrote:
> On Fri 29/05/09 00:12 , Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > And is another reason why people shouldn't keep !Scrap in a RAM disc,
> But isn't the whole idea of !Scrap, that all the files stored inside it
> are temporary files? Therefore storing !Scrap in a RAMDisc would appear
> logi
Paul Stewart wrote:
But isn't the whole idea of !Scrap, that all the files stored inside it are
temporary files?
Therefore storing !Scrap in a RAMDisc would appear logical.
That's as maybe, but putting !Scrap in a RAM disc is an archaic practice
dating back to the use of RISC OS 2 and floppy
On 28 May 2009, Tony Moore wrote:
[snip]
> [I] didn't file a bug report. Perhaps I should do so now?
Done
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2798361&group_id=51719&atid=464312
Tony
On 29 May, Paul Stewart wrote in message
<54662.1243577...@phawfaux.co.uk>:
> On Fri 29/05/09 00:12 , Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
> > And is another reason why people shouldn't keep !Scrap in a RAM disc,
>
> But isn't the whole idea of !Scrap, that all the files stored inside it
> are temporary file
On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:03 +0100
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> There's "temporary", and "temporary". Also, until someone (Adam
> Richardson, IIRC) came up with Cache, RISC OS didn't have defined
> "somewhere" to store "non-transient internal data that isn't
> choices". As such, Scrap seems to be the
Hi
Been using the recent test build of Netsurf and generally been able to
get around www.flickr.com where I have photo's.
If I go into my flickr page and click on the graph icon where I can
see the
photo statistics of how many people have viewed them etc, Netsurf
falls over and and finishes sayin
Hi again.
Wanted to post this as I re-downloaded version 2.1 23rd May 09 and I
don't suffer the problem on Flickr, so something has changed on the
test build.
Regards.
Brian
--
Check out Brian's pics at:
www.flickr.com/photos/httpflickrcomphotosbrian or
http://dslruser.co.uk/index.php/gallery
