Re: spurious newlines in lists in tables

2009-02-17 Thread Roger Darlington
On 16 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote: > In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, >Roger Darlington wrote: >> On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote: >> > In article , >> >Richard Porter wrote: > [snip] >> > Yes, but Netsurf still inserts a space after an end tag - > >> It does

Re: Wooo - getting there!

2009-02-17 Thread Roger Darlington
On 30 Jan 2009, Paul Vigay wrote: > I'm pleased to say that the severe text overwriting issue with a friend of > mine's website is now fixed, and you can view http://www.colinandrews.net/ > with the latest versions of NetSurf. :-) > > However, there's one little piece of text towards the bottom of

Re: Wooo - getting there!

2009-02-17 Thread Paul Vigay
In article <27b3fb2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, Roger Darlington wrote: > What did that removed document say? Good question. I'll have to email him for a copy of it. :-) -- Using, programming and promoting RISC OS - the most productive computer system in the world. Check it out now,

Re: Graphics refresh problem

2009-02-17 Thread Richard Ashbery
In article <88d7ae2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, Roger Darlington wrote: > On 16 Feb 2009, Richard Ashbery wrote: > > I've looked at it on Firefox on the PC with a 1280 x 1024 monitor > > and guess what I am unable to see the fourth frame. > The problem to which I was replying, Richard, is

Re: spurious newlines in lists in tables

2009-02-17 Thread Keith Hopper
In article <4cd5fa2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, Roger Darlington wrote: > On 16 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote: > > In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, > >Roger Darlington wrote: > >> On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote: > >> > In article , > >> >Richard Porter wro

Re: spurious newlines in lists in tables

2009-02-17 Thread Tim Hill
In article <502eafeecaasg...@inspire.net.nz>, Keith Hopper wrote: > In article <920b6d2e50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, Roger Darlington > wrote: > > On 1 Feb 2009, Keith Hopper wrote: > > > In article , Richard Porter > > > wrote: > [snip] > > > Yes, but Netsurf still inserts a spa

Re: spurious newlines in lists in tables

2009-02-17 Thread Richard Porter
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote: > The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of > the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being deprecated > is a desire to separate styling from the reason that a content needs a > particular style - 'i' and 'b' imply a pa

Re: spurious newlines in lists in tables

2009-02-17 Thread Tim Hill
In article , Richard Porter wrote: > On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote: > > The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of > > the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being > > deprecated they're not [Snip] -- Tim Hill, www.timil.com

Content, styling and media [was: spurious newlines

2009-02-17 Thread Keith Hopper
In article , Richard Porter wrote: [snip] > I'm trying to imagine just how you would intonate 'emphasised' and > 'strong' so as to differentiate them. In fact I don't really know what > 'strong' means in this context. Neither do I, in general; however, some combination of pauses, risi

Deprecated elements [was Re: spurious newlines

2009-02-17 Thread Keith Hopper
In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote: > In article , Richard Porter > wrote: > > On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote: > > > The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of > > > the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being > > > deprecated