In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Alan & Sally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> All we need is a mail programme to run alongside it. (Wish list)
One that doesn't puts the reply above the original?
But seriously, I don't see there is a need for another mail program on
RISC OS. We ha
On 6 Sep 2008 Alan & Sally wrote:
> I've had a couple of these, too. Using r5229 on RISCOS 3.5. The second
> occurred when I was trying to report the first.
Yes, I've had that a couple of times. You submit the Sourceforge form,
it gets submitted all right but then NetSurf crashes before you see
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know when the broken table code (ie. background colouring
> just repeating the first occurrence) is likely to get fixed.
Could you produce a test case?
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.net
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> > Does anyone know when the broken table code (ie. background colouring
> > just repeating the first occurrence) is likely to get fixed.
> Could you produce a test case?
There are seve
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> >Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So why does it not work when you use the third and much more obvious
> >> and visible al
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Sep 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 5 Sep 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
> >>> It searches the top level document, which is just a fra
On 6 Sep 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone know when the broken table code (ie. background colouring
>> just repeating the first occurrence) is likely to get fixed.
> Could you produce a test case?
You could loo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> > > Does anyone know when the broken table code (ie. background colouring
> > > just repeating the first occu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Drake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Vigay
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know when the broken table code (ie. background
> > colouring just repeating the first occurrence) is likely to get
> > fixed.
> Co
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> > >Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> So
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> Test case:
>
> yellow background
> no background
>
I think it always inherits the /first/ colour defined, thus, to add to your
test case;
yellow background
no background
red backgr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> > Test case:
> >
> > yellow background
> > no background
> >
> I think it always inherits the /first/ col
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Drake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> > Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 5 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
> > > > In article <[EMAIL PRO
On 6 Sep 2008, Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5 Sep 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
>> The search facility itself
>> is a feature, but once it's been implemented the fact that it can't
>> handle some types of pages is a bug
>
> No it
On 6 Sep 2008, Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 5 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
>> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
>> >Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> So why does it not work when you use the third a
On 6 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 5 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
>> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
>> > >Darlington
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roger Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot find a 'scale view' button in the 'Qute' theme I am using.
I *think* it has one. Over the toolbar, do Menu > Edit toolbar and you
should be able to drag whichever icons you want to the toolbar or remove
ones
On 5 Sep 2008, Richard Ashbery wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4 Sep 2008, Richard Porter wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> That is yet another bug in Netsurf that should have been reported
>> ages ago.
>
>> No other browser behaves like this, as
On 6 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Roger Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I cannot find a 'scale view' button in the 'Qute' theme I am using.
>
> I *think* it has one. Over the toolbar, do Menu > Edit toolbar and you
> should be able to drag which
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2008, Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> > Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 5 Sep 2008, Michael Drake wrote:
> >> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> >> >Darlington
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger Darlington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2008, Tim Hill wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 5 Sep 2008 Michael Drake wrote:
> >> The search facility itself is a feature, but once it's been
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Sep 2008, Richard Ashbery wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roger
> > Darlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> But on the 3rd column it tells you that there is a 4th column, and
> how to view it if y
In a mad moment - Michael Drake mumbled :
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone know when the broken table code (ie. background colouring
>> just repeating the first occurrence) is likely to get fixed.
> Could you produce a test case?
I hav
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Barry E Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.nowirul.myzen.co.uk/test.htm
> There should be a dark green border around each cell.
This was the same bug and it's fixed in the latest build.
Thanks for reporting.
Michael.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa)
On 6 Sep 2008 Paul Vigay wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Michael Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
>> Test case:
>>
>> yellow background
>> no background
>>
> I think it always inherits the /first/ colour defined, thus, to add to your
> test case
On 6 Sep 2008 Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think a feature request should be necessary to correct an
>> obvious shortcoming.
> Obvious to you perhaps.
Just consider a novice user viewing a web page. He or she has no
kn
Obviously the search tool should search through everything. This will be fixed
sometime. I don't know when because we can't plan to that detail.
I hope this will terminate this aimless thread.
James
--
James Bursa, NetSurf developerhttp://www.netsurf-browser.org/
27 matches
Mail list logo
