On 14 May 2008 Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be helpful if NetSurf alternated between two or three logfiles on
> successive runs. There have been several occasions where carelessly
> re-running NetSurf after a glitch has cost me a log file that I might
> otherwise have submitted
On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 May 2008 Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It would be helpful if NetSurf alternated between two or three logfiles on
>> successive runs. There have been several occasions where carelessly
>> re-running NetSurf after a glit
On 18 May 2008 Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> X Rename .WWW.NetSurf.Log
>> .WWW.NetSurf.OldLog
>> That should all be one line, incase email has munged it.
> Ignorant question: Is there a typo here, or do you really mean
On 18 May, Dr Peter Young wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Easily done. In !Run prior to the line:-
>
> > Run .!RunImage -v %*0 2>.WWW.NetSurf.Log
>
> > Add:-
>
> > X Rename .WWW.NetSurf.Log
> > .WWW.NetSurf.OldLog
On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 May 2008 Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> X Rename .WWW.NetSurf.Log
>>> .WWW.NetSurf.OldLog
>>> That should all be one line, incase email has munged it.
Hi Gavin,
Suppressing graphics - yes, but selecting just part of them to surpress - I
didn't think of it before. Thanks for this idea :)
Concerning "outside department" work - the rules of GSoC are flexible enough
to allow us to do also work loosely connected with ours, and also if time
permits or
