In a dim and distant universe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> > Up date : I find that even after shutdown and reboot the site I was
> > trying to access brings up the message any time I try to access it
> > viz: www.isogg.org
> With 90MB free memo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2008, "David Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If so how do I find List Archives?
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.netsurf.devel
That's a mirror of the developer's mailing list.
Users mailing list:
My local doctors practice is now proud to have a website where one can - in
theory - make appointments, etc. One annoying feature of the site is that,
on Netsurf at least, the page does not scale in width. Viewed on Windoze it
looks fine :(
The site is http://www.kenmoremedicalcentre.co.uk/defaul
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:33:41 + (GMT), Paul Vigay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem with www.isogg.com is an empty frame set at the bottom of the
^^^ org
> page. If you view the source code (wget or something), then at the bottom
> of the file, remove the
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> The site is http://www.kenmoremedicalcentre.co.uk/default.asp
> It looks as if http://www.opg.co.uk/contact.asp would be the place to
> complain but can someone tell me what specifically is the
On 25 Feb 2008 John wrote:
> My local doctors practice is now proud to have a website where one can - in
> theory - make appointments, etc. One annoying feature of the site is that,
> on Netsurf at least, the page does not scale in width. Viewed on Windoze it
> looks fine :(
> The site is http:/
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> However there is a general problem with NetSurf's handling of tables
> containing unclosed elements. Just try to view the SWI list on the OS3
> PRM CD. It will stagger table cells to th
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Paul Vigay wrote:
> I'm not sure if there's an official (W3C?) recommendation, but I'd
> have said that absolute widths should precedence over relative widths.
The various HTML specifications over the years have failed to provide
sufficient detail on the effects of combining
On 25 Feb 2008 Paul Vigay wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
>> However there is a general problem with NetSurf's handling of tables
>> containing unclosed elements. Just try to view the SWI list on the OS3
>>
On 25 Feb, Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
[Snip]
> However, later down in the code (line 160) there's a td width=2000 for
> the inner column, which is forcing it to be very wide. I ass
John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My local doctors practice is now proud to have a website where one
> can - in theory - make appointments, etc. One annoying feature of
> the site is that, on Netsurf at least, the page does not scale in
> width. Viewed on Windoze it looks fine :(
[...]
> can so
Having only just got round to doing something about this - sorry, a bit
slow - and having upgraded to !Printers 1.73, I have been experimenting.
Has something perhaps been updated just recently, I wonder, because I have
tried printing to my Kyocera FS-1200 using the PCL driver and also the
"Post
On 25 Feb 2008 John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having only just got round to doing something about this - sorry, a bit
> slow - and having upgraded to !Printers 1.73, I have been experimenting.
> Has something perhaps been updated just recently, I wonder, because I have
> tried printing to my
On 25 Feb, Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a word, no, not here anyway. As I understand it, PostScript drivers
> with Printers 1.73, at least till now, can't cope with Unicode fonts,
> and PostScript drivers are all I have here. However, if someone can
> tell me differently ...
On 25 Feb 2008 John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25 Feb, Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In a word, no, not here anyway. As I understand it, PostScript drivers
>> with Printers 1.73, at least till now, can't cope with Unicode fonts,
>> and PostScript drivers are all I have here.
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> Has there been a new 1.73, perhaps? Or am I missing some necessary
> modules? If so, what should I have, and where do I get them?
I've got all the latest versions installed here and I
On 25 Feb 2008 Paul Vigay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
>> Has there been a new 1.73, perhaps? Or am I missing some necessary
>> modules? If so, what should I have, and where do I get
17 matches
Mail list logo
