Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-23 Thread Erving
In message <5119c13964...@timil.com>, Tim Hill wrote: > In article <7c95871951.davehig...@dsl.pipex.com>, Dave Higton > wrote: > > >snip > > > Agreed. I continue to be amazed at the number of people who post to RO > > mailing lists and newsgroups, who have poor comprehension skills; i.e. > > t

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-19 Thread Tim Hill
In article , Steve Fryatt wrote: > On 18 May, george wrote in message : > > You did say it. OK, the word 'stable' was not used, but implied: see > > TIB article 'Last RISC OS version of NetSurf announced', dated 14 Jan > > 2010: > > > > "Team spokesman Michael Drake said earlier today: "NetSurf

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-19 Thread Tim Hill
In article <7c95871951.davehig...@dsl.pipex.com>, Dave Higton wrote: > In message <20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net> Rob > Kendrick wrote: > > On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:35:12 +0100 george > > wrote: > > > > > Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Dave Higton
In message <20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net> Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:35:12 +0100 > george wrote: > > > Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last > > stable RISC OS release > > Where did the developers say this? I d

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 18 May, george wrote in message : > You did say it. OK, the word 'stable' was not used, but implied: see TIB > article 'Last RISC OS version of NetSurf announced', dated 14 Jan 2010: > > "Team spokesman Michael Drake said earlier today: "NetSurf 2.5 is likely > to be the last release for R

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 18 May, Tim Hill wrote in message <51196f11fe...@timil.com>: > In article <56328.82.109.43.222.1274200724.squir...@91.84.211.154>, Steve > Fryatt wrote: > > [snip] > > > And, for the record, once things have stabilised following 2.5, I hope > > there will still be work done on the RISC O

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Dave Symes
In article <5119729ccbrh.li...@phone.coop>, Russell Hafter - Lists wrote: > In article > <20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, >Rob Kendrick wrote: > > Where did the developers say this? I don't remember any > > of us every saying this. Just that it was likely if > >

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Russell Hafter - Lists
In article <20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>, Rob Kendrick wrote: > Where did the developers say this? I don't remember any > of us every saying this. Just that it was likely if > somebody didn't come in and help with the RISC OS front > end. > Can people who keep sayi

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:02:09 +0100 george wrote: > > Can people who keep saying this please stop saying it until we say > > it. > > You did say it. OK, the word 'stable' was not used, but implied: see > TIB article 'Last RISC OS version of NetSurf announced', dated 14 Jan > 2010: > > "Team

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Tim Hill
In article <56328.82.109.43.222.1274200724.squir...@91.84.211.154>, Steve Fryatt wrote: [snip] > And, for the record, once things have stabilised following 2.5, I hope > there will still be work done on the RISC OS front-end -- time > permitting. Excellent news. Thanks for the clarification. -

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread george
In message <20100518172458.4024b...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net> Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:35:12 +0100 > george wrote: > >> Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last >> stable RISC OS release > > Where did the developers say this? I don'

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Steve Fryatt
On Tue, May 18, 2010 4:35 pm, george wrote: > Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last stable > RISC OS release, No, they haven't stated this. > should I continue to download and install test > builds from the RISC OS section of the Downloads area? Yes. Currently, the

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:35:12 +0100 george wrote: > Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last > stable RISC OS release Where did the developers say this? I don't remember any of us every saying this. Just that it was likely if somebody didn't come in and help with the

Re: test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 18 May 2010 george wrote: > Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last > stable RISC OS release, should I continue to download and install test > builds from the RISC OS section of the Downloads area? Presumably, at > a certain point, these will fail due to incompatibi

test builds after 2.5

2010-05-18 Thread george
Since the developers have stated that NetSurf 2.5 will be the last stable RISC OS release, should I continue to download and install test builds from the RISC OS section of the Downloads area? Presumably, at a certain point, these will fail due to incompatibility with the existing RO front end,