Re: google results page

2010-05-06 Thread Tony Moore
On 6 May 2010, "David J. Ruck" wrote: > On 05/05/2010 19:03, Tony Moore wrote: > > > As of today [?] Google has changed the format of its search results > > page. NetSurf (RISC OS) displays most of the page correctly, but > > there is some confusion, and overwriting, in the top left hand > > corne

Re: google results page

2010-05-06 Thread Richard Porter
On 6 May 2010 Jim Nagel wrote: > Richard Porter wrote on 6 May: >> On 6 May 2010 David J. Ruck wrote: >>> ... Of course the bug reporting facility does have a search facility to >>> allow to find an existing instance, which you can then add any new >>> information to. >> Unfortunately you can'

Re: google results page

2010-05-06 Thread Jim Nagel
Richard Porter wrote on 6 May: > On 6 May 2010 David J. Ruck wrote: >> ... Of course the bug reporting facility does have a search facility to >> allow to find an existing instance, which you can then add any new >> information to. > Unfortunately you can't add files to someone else's report, so

Re: google results page

2010-05-06 Thread Richard Porter
On 6 May 2010 David J. Ruck wrote: > Reporting bugs is like calling 999. Don't assume someone else has done > it - it is better to have multiple reports, than none at all. > Of course the bug reporting facility does have a search facility to > allow to find an existing instance, which you can the

Re: google results page

2010-05-06 Thread David J. Ruck
On 05/05/2010 19:03, Tony Moore wrote: As of today [?] Google has changed the format of its search results page. NetSurf (RISC OS) displays most of the page correctly, but there is some confusion, and overwriting, in the top left hand corner. Does this warrant a bug report? I'm sure that all the

google results page

2010-05-05 Thread Tony Moore
As of today [?] Google has changed the format of its search results page. NetSurf (RISC OS) displays most of the page correctly, but there is some confusion, and overwriting, in the top left hand corner. Does this warrant a bug report? I'm sure that all the developers can see the problem, themselve