On 25 Nov 2016 Chris Newman wrote:
> Hi,
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> least #3784 on it seems.
> Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
> Has been confirmed by others.
And has now been fixed in #3789. Thank
In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
Chris Newman wrote:
>Hi,
>
>http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
>Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>least #3784 on it seems.
>
>Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
I've just discovered that NetSurf 3.
On 26 Nov 2016 Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2016 as I do recall,
> Chris Newman wrote:
>> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>>
>> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>> least #3784 on it seems.
>>
> What's it supposed to do that it doe
On 25 Nov 2016 as I do recall,
Chris Newman wrote:
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> least #3784 on it seems.
>
What's it supposed to do that it doesn't?
(I just see a detailed description of how to
In message <382bc7e455.davem...@my.inbox.com>
Dave Higton wrote:
>In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
> Chris Newman wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>>
>>Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>>least #3784
In message <55e51740a7cvj...@waitrose.com>
Chris Newman wrote:
>In article ,
> David Pitt wrote:
>> Peter Slegg, on 26 Nov, wrote:
>
>> >
>> > > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:33:31 + (GMT) From: Chris Newman
>> > > Subject
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> Peter Slegg, on 26 Nov, wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:33:31 + (GMT) From: Chris Newman
> > > Subject: Website not renendering correctly To:
> > > netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org Message-ID:
>
Peter Slegg, on 26 Nov, wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:33:31 + (GMT) From: Chris Newman
> > Subject: Website not renendering correctly To:
> > netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org Message-ID:
> > <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com> Hi,
> >
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:33:31 + (GMT)
> From: Chris Newman
> Subject: Website not renendering correctly
> To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
> Message-ID: <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
> Hi,
>
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
> Whic
David Pitt, on 26 Nov, wrote:
> Peter Young, on 26 Nov, wrote:
>
> > On 26 Nov 2016 David Pitt wrote:
> >
> > > Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
> >
> > > > In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
> > >> Chris Newman wrote:
> > >>
> > > > > Hi,
> > >>>
> > > > > http://www.bapfis
Peter Young, on 26 Nov, wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2016 David Pitt wrote:
>
> > Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
>
> > > In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
> >> Chris Newman wrote:
> >>
> > > > Hi,
> >>>
> > > > http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
> >>>
> > > > Which formally wo
On 26 Nov 2016 David Pitt wrote:
> Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
>> In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
>> Chris Newman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>>>
>>> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>>> lea
Dave Higton, on 25 Nov, wrote:
> In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
> Chris Newman wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
> >
> > Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> > least #3784 on it seems.
>
> Behaviour chan
On 25 Nov 2016 Chris Newman wrote:
> Hi,
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> least #3784 on it seems.
> Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
> Has been confirmed by others.
OK on 3783 except that the background c
On 25 Nov 2016 Chris Newman wrote:
> Hi,
> http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
> Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
> least #3784 on it seems.
> Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
> Has been confirmed by others.
And I've put in a bug report.
http://
In message <55e4bd72e6cvj...@waitrose.com>
Chris Newman wrote:
>Hi,
>
>http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
>
>Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
>least #3784 on it seems.
Behaviour changed between 3751 and 3777, which are the nearest two
versi
Hi,
http://www.bapfish.org.uk/networking.htm
Which formally worked splendidly has now gone mammaries skyward. From at
least #3784 on it seems.
Still OK in the old Netsurf 3.5.
Has been confirmed by others.
--
Chris
17 matches
Mail list logo
