Re: Version Numbers

2009-03-30 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 18:54 +0200, John Williams wrote: > I see the version numbers are rolling on a-pace. SVN revision numbers are not version numbers. > When the current 4 digit 'r' number rolls over, will we expect a 5 digit > number such as 1 et seq? Of course. >

Version Numbers

2009-03-30 Thread John Williams
I see the version numbers are rolling on a-pace. When the current 4 digit 'r' number rolls over, will we expect a 5 digit number such as 1 et seq? I ask because my auto-downloading SW will require modding to cope. If so, when might this be anticipated to occur? John -- ||