On 15/02/18 16:00, Jim Nagel wrote:
That seems to mean Mozilla and Webkit. Is there perhaps an equivalent
for NetSurf?
No, we have no plans to implement draft specifications under
a vendor prefix.
We don't have enough developer bandwidth to implement all the
stuff that is currently standard,
Thanks for such a swift reply, Michael. Will digest and report back.
You said:
> The min-content value for width is just at editors draft stage.
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/
> So it's subject to change, and not standardized yet.
In the final para of my post, I didn't quote all the co
On 15/02/18 12:17, Jim Nagel wrote:
I'm wondering if Netsurf CSS supports these commands (if that's the
correct term)
display:table or width:min-content
Supported: display:table
Unsupported: width:min-content
The min-content value for width is just at editors draft stage.
https://d
In article ,
Michael Drake wrote:
> On 09/02/18 14:56, Jim Nagel wrote:
> > In CSS, is it possible to specify a particular RiscOS font?
> No, NetSurf only supports the generic font families.
This is a great tool for helping choose which generic font family.
https://www.w3schools.com/cssref
On 09/02/18 14:56, Jim Nagel wrote:
In CSS, is it possible to specify a particular RiscOS font?
No, NetSurf only supports the generic font families.
In CSS, how would I define a button to look like a familiar RiscOS
action button?
Input type image is probably your best bet, but it won't
In article <20161025101401.gb2...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:47:45AM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> > Any chance of Netsurf's CSS handling being extended a bit to support
> > "media query"?
> It has been on our list of "important" things to do for some
> con
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:47:45AM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> Any chance of Netsurf's CSS handling being extended a bit to support
> "media query"?
It has been on our list of "important" things to do for some
considerable time now. We know what needs to be done and how [1] but
as usual development
On 25/10/16 10:47, Jim Nagel wrote:
Any chance of NetSurf's CSS handling being extended a bit to support
"media query"?
It's something I'd like to get to soon. I've done a little thinking
about it, e.g.:
http://source.netsurf-browser.org/libcss.git/commit/?h=tlsa/media-queries&id=c80c8fa28f
In article <55d176ac00brian.jord...@btinternet.com>,
Brian Jordan wrote:
> I wonder if naming your stylesheet "...styles.css" might be at the root
> of this, if NetSurf already has a sheet with this, fairly common, name in
> a cache might it cause confusion? I try to use 'unguessable' names for
In article <55d16e1f32li...@torrens.org.uk>,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
[Snip]
> The first 3 links off that all contain
>
> which should align all the images right amongst other css.
> It did work fine and still does on Chrome - but there seems to be more
> to it! I've just tried with e
In article ,
Gavin Wraith wrote:
> In message <55d122c0cdli...@torrens.org.uk>
> "Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote:
> >The latest Netsurf 3.6 (Dev CI #3739) appears to be ignoring css. Does
> >anyone else find this?
> I cannot say that I have noticed it. Can you give us a URL frinsta
In message <55d122c0cdli...@torrens.org.uk>
"Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote:
>The latest Netsurf 3.6 (Dev CI #3739) appears to be ignoring css. Does
>anyone else find this?
I cannot say that I have noticed it. Can you give us a URL frinstance?
--
Gavin Wraith (ga...@wra1th.plus.com)
H
>On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 12:00:22 , netsurf-users-requ...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
>Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 14:35:24 +0200
>From: Ole Loots
>Subject: Re: CSS Base
>
>Hello,
>
>thanks for keeping an eye on the dev builds.
>
>The latest build (2106) should be fixed.
&
Hello,
thanks for keeping an eye on the dev builds.
The latest build (2106) should be fixed.
For more information see the commit:
http://git.netsurf-browser.org/netsurf.git/commit/?id=d7f479070e6a198084f92e77c26b9bb0e8cab471
Greets,
Ole
Am Freitag, den 12.09.2014, 19:39 + schrieb Peter S
I just tried the latest daily Atari build (2105) but I am still getting the
CSS Base error message.
At that point the log file looks like this :
(5.875000) content/content.c content_convert 283: content file:///./hotlist.htm
(0x1b1be0c)
(5.875002) render/html_css.c html_css_quirks_stylesheets
I can see the following message in the log:
(13.530001) render/html_css.c html_convert_css_callback 112:
stylesheet
file:///u%3A%5Cg%5CApplications%5Cnetsurf%5Cres%5Cdefault.css failed:
UnacceptableType
Also, I hope that the URL appearance is OK at that point, the URL
Encoding must
be remove
Looks like it's failing to find its resources. Neither the default
style sheet or the Messages file have loaded. I don't know how the
Atari front end deals with loading them.
Nope. These files are loaded correctly, I had a look at the debug log.
I suspect the Messages file isn't up to date. Pete
> Does anyone know what is wrong with the Atari daily builds?
Any page just opens a dialogue box saying CSS Base (attached).
No pages are rendered.
Can you please send the log?
I'm not at home because I broke my leg, but maybe there is something
interesting to see within the log.
Please
On 05/07/14 14:19, Peter Slegg wrote:
> Does anyone know what is wrong with the Atari daily builds?
>
> Any page just opens a dialogue box saying CSS Base (attached).
> No pages are rendered.
Looks like it's failing to find its resources. Neither the default
style sheet or the Messages file ha
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 07:39:35AM -0800, Jess Hampshire wrote:
> In message <52ef307005t...@netsurf-browser.org>
> Michael Drake wrote:
>
> > Originally this was because there was no way to implement it in a way that
> > would give satisfactory performance e.g. on peoples' RiscPCs. It
In message <52ef307005t...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> Originally this was because there was no way to implement it in a way that
> would give satisfactory performance e.g. on peoples' RiscPCs. It forces a
> serious penalty on scrolling pages that use it.
Would it be p
Chris Young wrote
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:03:15 GMT, John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>>> Does your design actually need it? Usually I detest it when I see it. :)
>>> The performance penalty can affect e.g. Chrome/Firefox on modern PCs too,
>>> although to a lesser extent.
>>
>> In this case, the d
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:03:15 GMT, John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> > Does your design actually need it? Usually I detest it when I see it. :)
> > The performance penalty can affect e.g. Chrome/Firefox on modern PCs too,
> > although to a lesser extent.
>
> In this case, the design really does need
Michael Drake wrote
> In article <970f2cef52.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>,
>John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
>> I would like to be able to fix some heading content on a page so that
>> when the page is scrolled the heading stays on the screen.
...
>> Is there anyway to do this that would work i
In article <970f2cef52.iyoj...@rickman.argonet.co.uk>,
John Rickman Iyonix wrote:
> I would like to be able to fix some heading content on a page so that
> when the page is scrolled the heading stays on the screen.
As you've seen position:fixed is not implemented. It is treated as
position:
In message <51aa07ea7at...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <51a9fbcf52joh...@ukgateway.net>,
>John Williams wrote:
>> Somewhere after r11753 up to r11769 outset bounding boxes have lost their
>> top and bottom border, leaving just left and right.
> Do you
In article <51aa10973at...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> Thanks, please try r11770.
Thank you; expected behaviour restored!
Best wishes,
John
In article <51aa08419bjoh...@ukgateway.net>,
John Williams wrote:
> URL is http://le.petit.four.free.fr/chorale/
Thanks, please try r11770.
--
Michael Drake (tlsa) http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
In article <51aa07ea7at...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> Do you mean outset borders? The one on the search button at
> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ is OK.
> Please provide an actual example.
I have been working on a prototype for my choir which /did/ display in
NetSurf mor
In article <51a9fbcf52joh...@ukgateway.net>,
John Williams wrote:
> Somewhere after r11753 up to r11769 outset bounding boxes have lost their
> top and bottom border, leaving just left and right.
Do you mean outset borders? The one on the search button at
http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ is O
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 18:03 +, Martin Bazley wrote:
> Just thought I'd share this (pure HTML and CSS) URL for when the new CSS
> parser is done:
That would be July 2009, then:
http://source.netsurf-browser.org/?view=rev&revision=8752
Being able to parse CSS correctly doesn't immediately mean
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:35:08 GMT
Gary Jones wrote:
> Does anyone know when/if the CSS pseudo class a:hover and z-index
> property is planned. I see they're listed as 'not started' at the
> moment.
There is no plan. Please note that this does not mean we do not intend
to implement it. Curren
In article <502370768at...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <502343dd84brian.jord...@btinternet.com>,
>Brian Jordan wrote:
> > A recent change to Netsurf...
[Snip]
> Should be fixed in the latest build.
It certainly is - thanks.
> > I am also aware that the photo
In article <502343dd84brian.jord...@btinternet.com>,
Brian Jordan wrote:
> A recent change to Netsurf has caused one of my sites to stop rendering
> as I intended. Very recently [1] my site at www.clubmans.org.uk started
> having its content jumping out of the containing in a very
> inelegant
In article <502343dd84brian.jord...@btinternet.com>,
Brian Jordan wrote:
> [1] This has happened within the last month but I can't say exactly when
> as I don't have previous builds available to me, I am also aware that the
> photo galleries don't work in NetSurf due to my use of some CSS which
35 matches
Mail list logo
