In message <505b25d553.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2014, Rev Dr Alan Leighton wrote:
> [snip]
>> All you have to do is put a Directory , call it StreetMap, on the HD
>> and drag an email into it. Then all one has to do is open the
>> Directory cl
On 4 Feb 2014, Rev Dr Alan Leighton wrote:
[snip]
> All you have to do is put a Directory , call it StreetMap, on the HD
> and drag an email into it. Then all one has to do is open the
> Directory click on the emailbingo!
... the email loads into MPro - but what has that to do with StreetMa
In message <980c69d453.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore wrote:
>On 3 Feb 2014, Peter Young wrote:
>> On 3 Feb 2014 Tony Moore wrote:
>> > On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
>>
>> > > Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load
>> > > all elements
In article ,
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
> > Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load all
> > elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
> You're right. Using NS 1602, http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm
> now renders both 3x
In message <10d362d453.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>
Peter Young wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2014 Tony Moore wrote:
>> On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
>>> Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load all
>>> elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
>> You're
On 3 Feb 2014, Rev Dr Alan Leighton wrote:
> In message
> Tony Moore wrote:
> > On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
>
> > > Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load
> > > all elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
>
> > You're right. Using NS 1602,
>
On 3 Feb 2014, Peter Young wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2014 Tony Moore wrote:
> > On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
>
> > > Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load
> > > all elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
>
> > You're right. Using NS 1602,
> > http://www.stre
On 3 Feb 2014 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
>> Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load all
>> elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
> You're right. Using NS 1602, http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm
> now renders both 3x3
In message
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
>> Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load all
>> elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
> You're right. Using NS 1602, http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm
> now renders bo
On 3 Feb 2014, John Williams wrote:
> Am I imagining it, or has StreetMap (without JS) decided to load all
> elements of the map each time? If so, well done!
You're right. Using NS 1602, http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm
now renders both 3x3 and 5x5 layouts, correctly.
Tony
On 8 Dec 2008 Torrens (lists) wrote:
> Streetmap's old site
> http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm
> There is a peculiarity in Netsurf ( r5886 )
> If you type in a postcode, Streetmap finds it OK.
> But if you drag and drop the same postcode, then click on Search,
> Streetmap returns an
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kevin Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So why is drag and drop into Netsurf giving the wrong thing? CTRL C-V
> >works as drag and drop.
> >
> I think it is a soft space when you type but a hard space when you drag
> abd drop or CTRL C-V
That _would_ explain i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Torrens (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Streetmap's old site
>http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm
>
>There is a peculiarity in Netsurf ( r5886 )
>
>If you type in a postcode, Streetmap finds it OK.
>
>But if you drag and drop the same postcode
13 matches
Mail list logo
