Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 26 Apr, Rob Kendrick wrote in message <20100426192242.34a3d...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:21:53 +0100 Kevin Wells > wrote: > > > How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain. > > > > I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to gri

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:21:53 +0100 Kevin Wells wrote: > How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain. > > I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to grips > if not to complicated. If you don't already have experience and knowledge of C, it's very very complicated.

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Kevin Wells
In message <20100426172843.6ed61...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net> Rob Kendrick wrote: > >If we can find nobody to commit to maintaining the RISC OS front end, >changes in the core will eventually break the RISC OS front end, and >stop it building at all. Existing releases and working

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Tony Moore
On 26 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:33 GMT > Tony Moore wrote: > > > > Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may > > > still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop > > > being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish. > >

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:33 GMT Tony Moore wrote: > > Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may > > still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop > > being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish. > > If development of the RISC OS front end were

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Tony Moore
On 26 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:46:32 GMT > Tony Moore wrote: > > > > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt. > > > It may continue to be developed, it may not. > > > > Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report > > bugs

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:46:32 GMT Tony Moore wrote: > > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt. > > It may continue to be developed, it may not. > > Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report bugs? Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RIS

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-26 Thread Tony Moore
On 25 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick wrote: [snip] > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt. It > may continue to be developed, it may not. Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report bugs? Tony

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:41:26 +0100 Dr Peter Young wrote: > > It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. > > Maybe I should have come to Wakefield. > > Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates > on the test builds page, at least one of which is RIS

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 25 Apr 2010 Michael Bell wrote: [snip] > It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I > should have come to Wakefield. Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates on the test builds page, at least one of which is RISC OS-specific. With bes

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread David Pitt
Michael Bell wrote: [snip - NetSurf 2.50 crash] > The original log has been lost. To preserve a log, quit NetSurf if it is still running then rename the log file. -- David Pitt

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Michael Bell
In message David Pitt wrote: > Michael Bell wrote: >> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker> >> John-Mark Bell wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote: In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org> Michael Drake wrot

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-25 Thread Dr Alan Leighton
In message David Pitt wrote: > Michael Bell wrote: >> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker> >> John-Mark Bell wrote: > The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this > is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-24 Thread David Pitt
Michael Bell wrote: > In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker> > John-Mark Bell wrote: > > > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote: > > > In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org> > >> Michael Drake wrote: > >> > >> > > > > The NetSurf developers

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-24 Thread Michael Bell
In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker> John-Mark Bell wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote: >> In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org> >> Michael Drake wrote: >> >> >>> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availab

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-24 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote: > In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org> > Michael Drake wrote: > > > > The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of > > NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. >

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-24 Thread Brian Jordan
In article <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>, Michael Drake wrote: > The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability > of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. [Snip] And I'm happy to be using it as my default browser here. -- _

Re: NetSurf 2.5 Released

2010-04-24 Thread Michael Bell
In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org> Michael Drake wrote: > The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of > NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements. > It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/ >