On 22 Feb 2009 as I do recall,
netsurf-users-requ...@netsurf-browser.org wrote:
> In article <0c736a3150.harr...@freeuk.com>,
>Harriet Bazley wrote:
> > Before I embark on another 2Mb+ of download... is there a problem with
> > my latest version of NetSurf (20 Feb)?
>
> Might be a
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:20:35 + (GMT), Michael Drake wrote:
> > Before I embark on another 2Mb+ of download... is there a problem with
> > my latest version of NetSurf (20 Feb)?
>
> Might be a problem. There were quite a few builds that day and I think one
> had that problem. The latest build
On 22 Feb 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 09:20 +, Michael Drake wrote:
>> In article <0c736a3150.harr...@freeuk.com>,
>>Harriet Bazley wrote:
>>> Before I embark on another 2Mb+ of download... is there a problem with
>>> my latest version of NetSurf (20 Feb)?
>>
>>
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 09:20 +, Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <0c736a3150.harr...@freeuk.com>,
>Harriet Bazley wrote:
> > Before I embark on another 2Mb+ of download... is there a problem with
> > my latest version of NetSurf (20 Feb)?
>
> Might be a problem. There were quite a few bui
In article <0c736a3150.harr...@freeuk.com>,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> Before I embark on another 2Mb+ of download... is there a problem with
> my latest version of NetSurf (20 Feb)?
Might be a problem. There were quite a few builds that day and I think one
had that problem. The latest build shou