John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My local doctors practice is now proud to have a website where one
> can - in theory - make appointments, etc. One annoying feature of
> the site is that, on Netsurf at least, the page does not scale in
> width. Viewed on Windoze it looks fine :(
[...]
> can so
On 25 Feb 2008 Paul Vigay wrote:
> In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
>> However there is a general problem with NetSurf's handling of tables
>> containing unclosed elements. Just try to view the SWI list on the OS3
>>
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Paul Vigay wrote:
> I'm not sure if there's an official (W3C?) recommendation, but I'd
> have said that absolute widths should precedence over relative widths.
The various HTML specifications over the years have failed to provide
sufficient detail on the effects of combining
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> However there is a general problem with NetSurf's handling of tables
> containing unclosed elements. Just try to view the SWI list on the OS3
> PRM CD. It will stagger table cells to th
On 25 Feb 2008 John wrote:
> My local doctors practice is now proud to have a website where one can - in
> theory - make appointments, etc. One annoying feature of the site is that,
> on Netsurf at least, the page does not scale in width. Viewed on Windoze it
> looks fine :(
> The site is http:/
In a dim and distant universe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> enlightened us thusly:
> The site is http://www.kenmoremedicalcentre.co.uk/default.asp
> It looks as if http://www.opg.co.uk/contact.asp would be the place to
> complain but can someone tell me what specifically is the
