In article <55bcf7a3bdnets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>,
Martin Avison wrote:
> 3.5 (6th April 1016)
So before the Norman Conquest, then?
--
| John Williams
| joh...@ukgateway.net
Names for Soul Band:- Soul Doubt *
In article <20160909125304.gn3...@platypus.pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> > But I have replaced !Cache.Caches.Default.Netsurf with a zip archive
> > called Netsurf. This appeasrs to work fine, currently it's 492K
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 01:37:42PM +0100, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> But I have replaced !Cache.Caches.Default.Netsurf with a zip archive
> called Netsurf. This appeasrs to work fine, currently it's 492K - with 75
> directories in it.
Replacing the directory with an image filing system using
In article <55bcdc22b0nets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>,
Martin Avison wrote:
> How does !Cache take account of NS choices? Disc cache is set to 1024MB.
> > What are the disadvantages of using a zip fine for Netsurf in !Cache.
> > This is on ARMX6. I'm aware that the lfau means that each block is
>
In article <55bc5e48e6li...@torrens.org.uk>,
Richard Torrens (lists) wrote:
> My SSD (250GB nominal) was running out - only about 6BG free.
> So I deleted !Cache's Netsurf directory. Now 157GB.
> Two questions:
> How does !Cache take account of NS choices? Disc cache is set to 1024MB.
> Wha
In article <18f1976b54@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> cj wrote on 16 Nov:
> > Is anyone else finding that the new Cache feature does not seem to
> > expire its content?
> Well, that was a revelation. Did a count on
> !Boot.resources.!cache.caches.default.netsurf and find 222 megaby
In article <18f1976b54@abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> The runfile of my active copy in Boot Resources (which presumably
> came with a recent-ish version of Netsurf inside its usual
> boot-update file) is dated 2014-09-16, but !Sidediff shows it is
> identical to the 2007 runfile.
This
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 01:15:26PM +, Jim Nagel wrote:
> A typical item within this folder is filetyped as text but contains
> gobbledygook.
"Text" is the default file type for files created using UnixLib. Given
these files are not meant to be consumed by humans, I don't see a
problem there.
cj wrote on 16 Nov:
> Is anyone else finding that the new Cache feature does not seem to
> expire its content?
Well, that was a revelation. Did a count on
!Boot.resources.!cache.caches.default.netsurf and find 222 megabytes
of stuff. Earliest date seems to be Sept 06.
A typical item within t
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 09:49:06PM +, cj wrote:
> In article <20141116145722.gc21...@platypus.pepperfish.net>,
>Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > Currently, if NetSurf crashes (or your computer does) without
> > quitting cleanly, newly-created cached items will be "leaked"; ie
> > they will not be s
In article <20141116145722.gc21...@platypus.pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> Currently, if NetSurf crashes (or your computer does) without
> quitting cleanly, newly-created cached items will be "leaked"; ie
> they will not be stored in the index which is written out on exit.
Ahhh - that
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 02:33:57PM +, cj wrote:
> I checked on the PandaBoard today and lo and behold, the cache
> contained more than 8 GB of files. This machine was also configured
> for a 1 GB max and 10 days expiry. I have now deleted and disabled
> the cache on the PandaRO.
>
> On all my
Should there be anything appearring in the cache folder ?
When I turn on OS debug output I can see errors:
pid 143 (ns020): sys_socket: fd 10
pid 143 (ns020): sys_connect(10, 0x253AA80, 16)
pid 143 (ns020): sys_connect(10): error -325
pid 143 (ns020): Fstat64(u:\g\Applications\netsurf\res\cache\d
On 5 October 2014 01:20:48 BST, Ole Loots wrote:
>Unpacking the package makes sure there is an folder called res/cache,
>AFAIK.
>I don't know how the netsurf core behaves when the folder is not found.
>
I think the front end is supposed to ensure it exists before enabling caching.
Chris
Hello.
>Am Donnerstag, den 02.10.2014, 09:10 +0200 schrieb J. F. Lemaire:
> On 2 October 2014 00:38, cj wrote:
> > I would have thought that any sensibly implemented system should
> > automatically create folders that do not exist, rather than die.
>
> That's what happened on my Atari system so
On 2 October 2014 00:38, cj wrote:
> In article <000def68.01ffd4900...@smtp.freeola.net>,
>Peter Slegg wrote:
>> A look in the log showed it was trying top open res/cache/control
>> so I created an empty folder res/cache
>
>> Netsurf was then able to start.
>
> I would have thought that any s
In article <000def68.01ffd4900...@smtp.freeola.net>,
Peter Slegg wrote:
> A look in the log showed it was trying top open res/cache/control
> so I created an empty folder res/cache
> Netsurf was then able to start.
I would have thought that any sensibly implemented system should
automatically
17 matches
Mail list logo
