Re: New Builds

2007-11-18 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll set-up a script to try that next time it occurs. I suppose, if that > works OK, then I could use that instead of a browser request, particularly > as I'm already using cURL to fetch the zip file. In anticipation of

Re: New Builds

2007-11-13 Thread Kevin Wells
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What happens if you force a reload in whichever browser? > >The same page is reloaded. > >> Does a commandline request for the p

Re: New Builds

2007-11-13 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Silverstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What happens if you force a reload in whichever browser? The same page is reloaded. > Does a commandline request for the page (E.g. using wget or cURL result > in a correctly downloaded uncached page? I'll set-up

Re: New Builds

2007-11-13 Thread Daniel Silverstone
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 23:14 +, John Williams wrote: > I have never imagined it was NetSurf's fault. I tried other browsers as > well! My theory was it was a cache along the way - hence my request for > no-cache tags on the page! All a no-cache tag would do is prevent systems which should be ca

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You see the old and new pages simultaneously when you use NetSurf, but > what happens when you use a different browser? If the problem persists, > it would suggest that NetSurf is not causing it. I have never imagined it w

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread Tony Moore
On 12 Nov 2007, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Maybe there's no cache problem - if there's no new build, you'll see > > the same page every time. > > In my earlier posting, Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> y

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe there's no cache problem - if there's no new build, you'll see the > same page every time. In my earlier posting, Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you will see that I wrote: > Using the query string trick, I managed

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 18:47 +, Tony Moore wrote: > Rob will correct me if I am wrong, but I understand that a new RISC OS > build will not follow SVN changes related to documentation files, etc., > or, obviously, if the changes are Linux related. My understanding (I did not write the code in

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread Tony Moore
On 12 Nov 2007, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Using dialup, > > Same here ATM. > > > I launch the 10-minute wget-download > > Mine uses cURL > > > only if the SVN change-details suggest that a new version

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using dialup, Same here ATM. > I launch the 10-minute wget-download Mine uses cURL > only if the SVN change-details suggest that a new version exists. If > unsure, I check the download page, first. Which is where I cam

Re: New Builds

2007-11-12 Thread Tony Moore
On 11 Nov 2007, John Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try subscribing to cia.navi.cx/stats/project/NetSurf/.rss > > A useful suggestion - but: > > It involves having Ticker being constantly loaded or invok

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try subscribing to cia.navi.cx/stats/project/NetSurf/.rss A useful suggestion - but: It involves having Ticker being constantly loaded or invoked. The current message bears today's date - but lists (today

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 11 Nov 2007 Tony Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11 Nov 2007, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:01 +, John Williams wrote: >> >>> I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because >>>

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread Tony Moore
On 11 Nov 2007, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:01 +, John Williams wrote: > > > I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because > > (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The more often I check, the > >

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread John Williams
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Kendrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There have been no builds since the 5th of November. Additionally, NTL > no longer transparently proxy and cache its users. What date are you > seeing on the page? I see that one fine, it was previous versions, and par

Re: New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:01 +, John Williams wrote: > I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because > (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The more often I check, the less > likely, it seems, to find them! > > Could the Builds page (http://www.nets

New Builds

2007-11-11 Thread John Williams
I have experienced difficulties finding out about new builds because (presumably) my ISP (NTL) caches pages. The more often I check, the less likely, it seems, to find them! Could the Builds page (http://www.netsurf-browser.org/builds/) have something in its header to prevent this, please? I do