On 11 Jul 2010 as I do recall,
Tim Hill wrote:
> >From these comments I guess Harriet was using a similar version to
> r10592 (01 Jul 2010) which only has 2 entries under Netsurf in the
> hotlist here.
>
> Or is an old hotlist in use because we have actually added entries or
> our own?
>
In article , Tony Moore
wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2010, Anthony Hilton wrote:
> [snip]
> > Or is an old hotlist in use because we have actually added entries or
> > our own?
> >
> > Whenever I install a new versionn of Netsurf I delete the previous
> > before placing the latest into the directory wher
On 10 Jul 2010, Anthony Hilton wrote:
[snip]
> Or is an old hotlist in use because we have actually added entries or
> our own?
>
> Whenever I install a new versionn of Netsurf I delete the previous
> before placing the latest into the directory where I store it.
That will not affect the Hotlis
In message <513489fb8c...@timil.com>
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article <861b503451.old_coas...@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>, Tony Moore
> wrote:
>> On 9 Jul 2010, Harriet Bazley wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> Presumably we're still supposed to be using the page pointed to via
>>> 'Contact the develope
In article <861b503451.old_coas...@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>, Tony Moore
wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2010, Harriet Bazley wrote:
> [snip]
> > Presumably we're still supposed to be using the page pointed to via
> > 'Contact the developers' in .Docs.welcome.index_en, i.e.
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/
On 9 Jul 2010, Harriet Bazley wrote:
[snip]
> Presumably we're still supposed to be using the page pointed to via
> 'Contact the developers' in .Docs.welcome.index_en, i.e.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=51719&atid=464312
>
> Or has this, as comments further down this thr
In article <3ac5493451.harr...@blueyonder.co.uk>, Harriet
Bazley wrote:
> On 8 Jul 2010 as I do recall, wrote:
> > In NetSurf's hotlist follow the entry NetSurf to
> > 'NetSurf bug tracker' where you can peruse 1125 entries
> > before using 'add new' if you need to.
> Just to clarify - my NetS
On 8 Jul 2010 as I do recall,
wrote:
> In NetSurf's hotlist follow the entry NetSurf to 'NetSurf bug tracker'
> where you can peruse 1125 entries before using 'add new' if you need to.
>
Just to clarify - my NetSurf hotlist has two sub-entries under the
heading "NetSurf", one of which r
In message <5133b8483dd...@triffid.co.uk>
Dave Symes wrote:
> In article <5133a3dc67rh.li...@phone.coop>,
>Russell Hafter - Lists wrote:
> [Snippy]
>> What, for example, is the "Group" pull down menu for?
> Network orgies. ;-)
> Dave
Naughty ;-)
Alan
--
In article <5133a3dc67rh.li...@phone.coop>,
Russell Hafter - Lists wrote:
[Snippy]
> What, for example, is the "Group" pull down menu for?
Network orgies. ;-)
Dave
--
Dave Triffid
In article <5133a12c7b...@timil.com>, Tim Hill
wrote:
> In NetSurf's hotlist follow the entry NetSurf to 'NetSurf
> bug tracker' where you can peruse 1125 entries before
> using 'add new' if you need to.
That does look less user unfriendly than it used to. But I
still imagine that many people wi
In article <0a7a9a3351.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>, Michael
Bell wrote:
> In message <1278590633.4c35bea90a...@netmail.pipex.net> dave higton
>wrote:
> > Quoting Michael Bell :
> >> A Netsurf failure log, it trips up on some sites but the BBC is
> >> usually kosher.
> > Is
In message <1278590633.4c35bea90a...@netmail.pipex.net>
dave higton wrote:
> Quoting Michael Bell :
>> A Netsurf failure log, it trips up on some sites but the BBC is
>> usually kosher.
> Is there any reason that you didn't report this as a bug via the
> proper route instead of sendin
Quoting Michael Bell :
> A Netsurf failure log, it trips up on some sites but the BBC is
> usually kosher.
Is there any reason that you didn't report this as a bug via the
proper route instead of sending here?
Dave
A Netsurf failure log, it trips up on some sites but the BBC is
usually kosher.
Michael Bell
--
BBCLog
Description: Zip archive
15 matches
Mail list logo
