ived.
>
> > [1]
> > http://vincentsanders.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/netsurf-developer-workshop-redux.html
>
> It is great to read that you are all obviously so committed to the
> project. Thank you all.
>
> It's worth reading the report, if only to chuckle at the final sentence!
> ;-)
I lik
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:10:34PM +, Tim Hill wrote:
>
> It's worth reading the report, if only to chuckle at the final sentence!
> ;-)
Vivek was the savior of my stupidity. Vince's keys don't even look like
my keys.
B.
In article <20140106220844.gl6...@kyllikki.org>, Vincent Sanders
wrote:
> The write up of our recent developer weekend is now available [1] for
> those interested in what we achived.
> [1]
> http://vincentsanders.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/netsurf-developer-workshop-redux.html
I
The write up of our recent developer weekend is now available [1] for
those interested in what we achived.
[1]
http://vincentsanders.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/netsurf-developer-workshop-redux.html
--
Regards Vincent
In article <20121108132245.gc26...@pepperfish.net>,
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:35:03PM +, Chris Gransden wrote:
> > In article <20121107230822.GC2863@somnambulist.local>,
> >Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> >
> > > We're targetting 1.8.5 I'm afraid.
> >
> > > We've g
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:35:03PM +, Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107230822.GC2863@somnambulist.local>,
>Daniel Silverstone wrote:
>
> > We're targetting 1.8.5 I'm afraid.
>
> > We've gotten NSPR building but we're stuck at sorting out mozjs because it
> > gets
> > confused
In article
,
Chris Young wrote:
> Sounds like the problem I was getting, which this patch fixes:
> http://git.netsurf-browser.org/netsurf.git/patch/?id=24c43ea6a210cd1b98e911d989de400ef343e7bb
> NetSurf won't build with 1.70 (yet), and me and Ole can't get 1.80 to
> work on big-endian hosts,
In article <20121107230822.GC2863@somnambulist.local>,
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> We're targetting 1.8.5 I'm afraid.
> We've gotten NSPR building but we're stuck at sorting out mozjs because it
> gets
> confused between the host and the target NSPR installs.
Is that with or without the jit
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:16:41PM +, Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
> > > Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> > > test-build titles be meaningful, I wonder ;-)
> > Indeed.
> > Until and unless we can get libmozjs port
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 22:16 +, Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
>Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +, george greenfield wrote:
> > > Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> > > test-bu
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:16:41 + (GMT), Chris Gransden wrote:
> In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
>Daniel Silverstone wrote:
>
> > Until and unless we can get libmozjs ported to RISC OS, it'll be jsoff there
> > all the time :-(
>
> I got 1.8 and 1.7 to build for RISC
In article <20121107215800.GB2863@somnambulist.local>,
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +, george greenfield wrote:
> > Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> > test-build titles be meaningful, I wonder ;-)
> Indeed.
> Until and unle
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +, george greenfield wrote:
> Re javascript and NetSurf, could the 'jsoff' component in the
> test-build titles be meaningful, I wonder ;-)
Indeed.
Until and unless we can get libmozjs ported to RISC OS, it'll be jsoff there
all the time :-(
D.
--
Daniel
In message <52ea7bdaaaj...@jaharrison.me.uk>
John Harrison wrote:
>
>> Most of the JS I've ever encountered ...
>
> IME JS is often used to hide e-mail addresses from web crawlers looking for
> spam fodder. Currently such addresses (and sometimes the associated names)
> are invisible
In article ,
Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 5 Nov 2012 as I do recall,
> Vincent Sanders wrote:
> > We held our latest developer workshop this weekend, I have written
> > about it on my blog[1] for those who might be interested in what we got
> > up to.
> >
> > [1]http://vincentsanders.
On 5 Nov 2012 as I do recall,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
> We held our latest developer workshop this weekend, I have written
> about it on my blog[1] for those who might be interested in what we got
> up to.
>
> [1]http://vincentsanders.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/another-netsurf-developer-work
> Most of the JS I've ever encountered ...
IME JS is often used to hide e-mail addresses from web crawlers looking for
spam fodder. Currently such addresses (and sometimes the associated names)
are invisible. Tt will be a great improvement being able to see them.
--
John Harrison
Website http
The following bytes were arranged on 5 Nov 2012 by Rob Kendrick :
> It should be noted that if we do manage to get a RISC OS build of
> NetSurf 3.0 with JavaScript support (at the moment we do not have the
> actual interpreter built for RISC OS, but do have its dependancies
> built), it will not w
In article ,
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 5 Nov 2012, george greenfield
> wrote:
> > In message <65188.62.172.88.217.1352127050.squirrel@email.orpheusnet.c
> > o.uk> "Learning Partners" wrote:
> >
> > > Massive thanks are due to all involved. I look forward to the next
> > > stable release and the
On 5 Nov 2012, george greenfield
wrote:
> In message <65188.62.172.88.217.1352127050.squirrel@email.orpheusnet.c
> o.uk> "Learning Partners" wrote:
>
> > Massive thanks are due to all involved. I look forward to the next
> > stable release and the javascript implementation.
>
> Seconded, with fee
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:57:58PM +, Roger Crabb wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 14:54, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> >Full dynamic layout requires a significant reworking of our layout code
> >to be able to cope with the document changing, and this is scheduled for
> >a future version of NetSurf beyond 3.0.
>
On 05/11/2012 14:54, Rob Kendrick wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:50:50PM -, Learning Partners wrote:
Massive thanks are due to all involved. I look forward to the next stable
release and the javascript implementation.
It should be noted that if we do manage to get a RISC OS build of
Net
In message <65188.62.172.88.217.1352127050.squirrel@email.orpheusnet.c
o.uk>
"Learning Partners" wrote:
> Massive thanks are due to all involved. I look forward to the next stable
> release and the javascript implementation.
Seconded, with feeling! I hadn't expected to see /any/ form
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 02:50:50PM -, Learning Partners wrote:
> Massive thanks are due to all involved. I look forward to the next stable
> release and the javascript implementation.
It should be noted that if we do manage to get a RISC OS build of
NetSurf 3.0 with JavaScript support (at the
Massive thanks are due to all involved. I look forward to the next stable
release and the javascript implementation.
RISC OS Netsurf user but this is from Opera on my PC!
Dr John Hurley
Research, Project Development and Publications for Education
On Mon, 5 November, 2012 2:01 pm, Vincent Sanders
We held our latest developer workshop this weekend, I have written
about it on my blog[1] for those who might be interested in what we got
up to.
[1]http://vincentsanders.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/another-netsurf-developer-workshop.html
--
Regards Vincent
http://www.kyllikki.org/
26 matches
Mail list logo
