On 26 Apr, Rob Kendrick wrote in message
<20100426192242.34a3d...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:21:53 +0100 Kevin Wells
> wrote:
>
> > How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain.
> >
> > I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to gri
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:21:53 +0100
Kevin Wells wrote:
> How easy would the RISC OS front end be to maintain.
>
> I'm not bad at BASIC know a bit of PHP, so may be able to get to grips
> if not to complicated.
If you don't already have experience and knowledge of C, it's very very
complicated.
In message <20100426172843.6ed61...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
>If we can find nobody to commit to maintaining the RISC OS front end,
>changes in the core will eventually break the RISC OS front end, and
>stop it building at all. Existing releases and working
On 26 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:33 GMT
> Tony Moore wrote:
>
> > > Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may
> > > still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop
> > > being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish.
> >
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:24:33 GMT
Tony Moore wrote:
> > Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RISC OS front end may
> > still continue to be supported, or it may not. And if it does stop
> > being supported, I suspect it won't simply vanish.
>
> If development of the RISC OS front end were
On 26 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:46:32 GMT
> Tony Moore wrote:
>
> > > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt.
> > > It may continue to be developed, it may not.
> >
> > Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report
> > bugs
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:46:32 GMT
Tony Moore wrote:
> > Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt.
> > It may continue to be developed, it may not.
>
> Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report bugs?
Yes. Why wouldn't there be? As I said, the RIS
On 25 Apr 2010, Rob Kendrick wrote:
[snip]
> Currently, the future of the RISC OS front end is still in doubt. It
> may continue to be developed, it may not.
Is there any point in RISC OS NetSurf users continuing to report bugs?
Tony
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:41:26 +0100
Dr Peter Young wrote:
> > It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further.
> > Maybe I should have come to Wakefield.
>
> Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates
> on the test builds page, at least one of which is RIS
On 25 Apr 2010 Michael Bell wrote:
[snip]
> It's so sad that NetSurf is not going to be developed further. Maybe I
> should have come to Wakefield.
Not so, I think. Since 2.5 came out there have been several updates on
the test builds page, at least one of which is RISC OS-specific.
With bes
Michael Bell wrote:
[snip - NetSurf 2.50 crash]
> The original log has been lost.
To preserve a log, quit NetSurf if it is still running then rename the log
file.
--
David Pitt
In message
David Pitt wrote:
> Michael Bell wrote:
>> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
>> John-Mark Bell wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrot
In message
David Pitt wrote:
> Michael Bell wrote:
>> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
>> John-Mark Bell wrote:
> The NetSurf developers have done a very good job with version 2.50, if this
> is the end of the road due to lack of RISC OS developers then 2.50 is
Michael Bell wrote:
> In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
> John-Mark Bell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
> > > In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
> >> Michael Drake wrote:
> >>
> >>
> > > > The NetSurf developers
In message <1272149852.6726.1.ca...@duiker>
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
>> In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
>> Michael Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availab
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 22:10 +0100, Michael Bell wrote:
> In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
> Michael Drake wrote:
>
>
> > The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of
> > NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
>
In article <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>, Michael Drake
wrote:
> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability
> of NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
[Snip]
And I'm happy to be using it as my default browser here.
--
_
In message <510d269ff2t...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of
> NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
> It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
>
The NetSurf developers are happy to announce the immediate availability of
NetSurf 2.5. This release contains many bug fixes and improvements.
It is available to download from http://www.netsurf-browser.org/
Here is a change log detailing the important changes in this release:
Core / All
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
