In article <6867f785-ecfc-4839-aaf2-fa02655d1...@powys.org>, Tim
Powys-Lybbe wrote:
> > On 27 May 2017, at 5:01 pm, Tim Hill wrote:
> >
> > In article <5642c25e44ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>, cj
> > wrote:
> >> In article , Tim
> >> Powys-Lybbe wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >
> >>> I've just found tha
In article <6867f785-ecfc-4839-aaf2-fa02655d1...@powys.org>,
Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote:
> Ah, that suggests that SUP works correctly within CSS but not within
> old-fashioned simple HTML, which is what I use.
No, they both work fine. See attached html version plus screenshot.
If they are not the
> On 27 May 2017, at 5:01 pm, Tim Hill wrote:
>
> In article <5642c25e44ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>, cj
> wrote:
>> In article , Tim
>> Powys-Lybbe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>
>>> I've just found that the SUP HTML command does not superimpose in
>>> Netsurf 3.3, so I got the latest versio, 3.6, nor in
In article <5642c25e44ch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>, cj
wrote:
> In article , Tim
>Powys-Lybbe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've just found that the SUP HTML command does not superimpose in
> > Netsurf 3.3, so I got the latest versio, 3.6, nor in that, finally I
> > read the advice and got last night's
In article ,
Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just found that the SUP HTML command does not superimpose in
> Netsurf 3.3, so I got the latest versio, 3.6, nor in that, finally
> I read the advice and got last night's 4088 build and it still
> didn't, so I wonder if this is something that I
Hi,
I've just found that the SUP HTML command does not superimpose in Netsurf 3.3,
so I got the latest versio, 3.6, nor in that, finally I read the advice and got
last night's 4088 build and it still didn't, so I wonder if this is something
that I have not read about. Is not a recognised mode
