On 18 Feb 2009 JJ van Poll wrote:
> In message <502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz>
> Keith Hopper wrote:
>> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>>Tim Hill wrote:
>>> In article , Richard Porter
>>> wrote:
On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> The element which should be
On 18 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article , Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reaso
In message <502f57db9easg...@inspire.net.nz>
Keith Hopper wrote:
> In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
>Tim Hill wrote:
>> In article , Richard Porter
>> wrote:
>>> On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
In article <502f456d69...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> In article , Richard Porter
> wrote:
> > On 17 Feb 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> > > The element which should be used is the 'em' element and, instead of
> > > the 'b' element, use 'strong'. The reason for the others being
> > > deprecated
