On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:29:31 + (GMT)
"Torrens (lists)" wrote:
> As font sizes greater than the default don't work, how do I set 140%
> as the default Scale view for all pages?
>
> Do I detect another Choices config coming up? Or can a default
> magnification b
As font sizes greater than the default don't work, how do I set 140% as
the default Scale view for all pages?
Do I detect another Choices config coming up? Or can a default
magnification be added to Font sizes?
--
Richard Torrens.
http://www.Torrens.org.uk for genealogy, natural history,
On 13 Aug 2007, Brian Jordan wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Paul Sprangers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Dear developers,
>
>> At some point, builds since the beginning of August fail to take the
>> default scale factor into account
Dear David, Brian and Rob,
Thank you very much for your replies.
Indeed, the new token works.
I never used the 'Save as default option', because I'm discouraging
foolish, but perhaps also, because I seem to remember vaguely that in some
grey and distant past, setting the default scale factor was
Paul Sprangers wrote:
Dear developers,
At some point, builds since the beginning of August fail to take the
default scale factor into account. I have a default magnification of 150%
(manually set in the choices file), but since a few days, NetSurf overrules
this by displaying everything at 100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Sprangers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear developers,
> At some point, builds since the beginning of August fail to take the
> default scale factor into account. I have a default magnification of
> 150% (manually set in the choice
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul Sprangers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Magnification works here on RO 4.39 from the 'menu, display scale view.'
>> with latest Developement (11Aug 23.45). Does this work Paul.
> Yes, it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John McCartney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it's something in your RO 5.13 which is causing the problem.
Possibly, but then it's at least a combination of both operating system and
build. The 15 July version and all the older builds ran happily on my RO
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John McCartney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Sprangers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Phil
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Magnification works here on RO 4.39 from the 'menu,
> > > disp
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Sprangers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Phil
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Magnification works here on RO 4.39 from the 'menu,
> > display scale view.' with latest Developement (11Aug
> > 23.45). Does this work Paul.
> Yes,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Magnification works here on RO 4.39 from the 'menu, display scale view.'
> with latest Developement (11Aug 23.45). Does this work Paul.
Yes, it works, but that was not what I intended to say.
In the choices file (boot.choices.ww
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Sprangers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear developers,
> At some point, builds since the beginning of August fail to take the
> default scale factor into account. I have a default magnification of
> 150% (manually set in the choice
Dear developers,
At some point, builds since the beginning of August fail to take the
default scale factor into account. I have a default magnification of 150%
(manually set in the choices file), but since a few days, NetSurf overrules
this by displaying everything at 100%.
I'd love to see
13 matches
Mail list logo
