On 27 Apr, cj wrote in message
<56ef67beabch...@chris-johnson.org.uk>:
> In article <9e0265ef56@6.abbeypress.net>,
>Jim Nagel wrote:
> > Anybody concur with me?
>
> Yes - this has been present since the dark ages. I thought it had been
> reported many years ago.
I'm fairly sure (wit
On 27 Apr 2018 Jim Nagel wrote:
> Anybody concur with me?
Yes I've raised bug reports about it in the past.
--
Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
t: @westernexplorer mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com
I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff
In article <9e0265ef56@6.abbeypress.net>,
Jim Nagel wrote:
> Anybody concur with me?
Yes - this has been present since the dark ages. I thought it had
been reported many years ago.
--
Chris Johnson
Edinburgh
I raised a report on the bug-tracker about really bad linebreaks that
Netsurf sometimes commits.
This isn't a new thing. I'm using #4316 but fault has existed since
many many versions ago and as far as I know has never been reported.
My theory is that the Netsurf code thinks it's OK to start a
In article <56ef43aa6dnets...@avisoft.f9.co.uk>,
Martin Avison wrote:
> If anyone wants to try my small program which produces file and directory
> statistics for the disc cache, plus an obey file which if run will delete
> all empty directories, please email me.
Yes please.
I have, on a few
I know from previous posts that using the Netsurf v3.7 disc cache on my
Iyonix running RISC OS is probably not improving performance, depending
on how low my internet speed is. I am using it to gain experience in the
hope that newer, faster hardware will bring some performance benefits.
After run
