In article <56abf2cfb6li...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
> Thhanks - I can't have dug dseep enough. But what a pain - I extract
> URLs from NetSurf's URL bar using !Transfer2. It of course picks up the
> unglyphed version.
Indeed, I am someone who will often S&R & for & in a webp
In article <56abf12512...@timil.com>,
Tim Hill wrote:
> No, & won't work from your editor. It will work only in the Browser.
> The four amp version of the link above will be
> http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=omeprazole+causes+bile+reflux&btnG=Google+Search
> And
In article <56abea205fli...@torrens.org>, Richard Torrens (lists)
wrote:
> I was trying to validate an html page using w3c validator. I could not!
> The reason was that the page contains lots of links to Google searches
> etc. e.g. href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859
I was trying to validate an html page using w3c validator. I could not!
The reason was that the page contains lots of links to Google searches
etc. e.g.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=omeprazole+causes+bile+reflux&btnG=Google+Search";>
The validator complains about
