Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-15 Thread David Pitt
John Williams, on 15 Apr, wrote: > In article <20130415072710.ga30...@kyllikki.org>, >Vincent Sanders wrote: > > > If you want this fixed please submit it to our issue tracker, otherwise > > it is liable to be ignored. > > > Some brief analysis shows this is due to the css rule: > > > .cur

Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-15 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 21:59 +0100, John Williams wrote: > It needs sorting! Patches are always welcome. J.

Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-15 Thread John Williams
In article <20130415072710.ga30...@kyllikki.org>, Vincent Sanders wrote: > If you want this fixed please submit it to our issue tracker, > otherwise it is liable to be ignored. > Some brief analysis shows this is due to the css rule: > .curvedboxcontainer h1 { > font-family: Passion One, Hel

Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-15 Thread Chris Young
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:27:10 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote: > I also note NetSurf falls back to the sans-serif font choice > which should not be a factor. That should probably be on the request tracker too, if it isn't already. I remember some discussion about implementing usage of specific fonts

Re: Upper character truncation - CSS handling

2013-04-15 Thread Vincent Sanders
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:04:10PM +0100, John Williams wrote: > > I see at: > > http://www.pets4homes.co.uk/sale/dogs/bedlington-terrier/wakefield/ > > an illustration of the subject line which may be related to the problem > (which I have lost track of) reported by me, and, I think, Da