In article <5311076574bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian Bailey wrote:
> > > > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> > > > >
> > > > > NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine necessitating
> > > > >
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 04:40:20PM +, Brian Bailey wrote:
> What, please, is the current status of Flash working with NetSurf?
The current state is that it will not work (we long ago disabled plugin
support), and that we're never likely to have it. This isn't so much of
a problem because Flas
What, please, is the current status of Flash working with NetSurf?
A search doesn't come up with anything particularly edifying.
My copy is 0.411.1.1 29 Nov 2004
I guess it's a case of don't hold your breath.
In article <63e60e1153.ch...@cdewhurst2010.btinternet.com>,
Christoper Dewhurst wrote:
> Dear all
> Just to let you know that with the able and willing assistance of
> John-Mark Bell we have solved the problem.
> I had an out-of-date version of a module installed, called
> CryptRandom. Origin
Dear all
Just to let you know that with the able and willing assistance of
John-Mark Bell we have solved the problem.
I had an out-of-date version of a module installed, called
CryptRandom. Originally (when Netsurf reported it needed CryptRand)
I'd Googled for "CryptRandom" and the search resu
> > > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > > >
> > > > http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_frankenfish_r/?blOZUcb&v=21102
> > > >
> > > > NetSurf goes into a loop. alt-break froze the machine necessitating a
> > > > ctrl-break re-set.
> > > Unfortunately I cannot test this without signing a pet
In article <530ff3bf54bbai...@argonet.co.uk>,
Brian Bailey wrote:
> In article <20130118094055.gp15...@pepperfish.net>,
>Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:53:38AM +, Brian Bailey wrote:
> > > When sending a petition to avaaz.org
> > >
> > > http://www.avaaz.org/en/st
On 20 Jan, "Richard Torrens (lists)" wrote in message
<5310fde37bli...@torrens.org.uk>:
> The main problem I find is not the speed, but the fact that there is a
> buffer somewhere that stores scroll clicks, so that scrolling continues
> after the wheel is stopped.
That's in RISC OS, and happe
On 20 Jan, Richard Ashbery wrote in message
<5310f9b9afris...@gotadsl.co.uk>:
> In article <2737921053.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
> wrote:
> > On most applications, including messenger Pro, the speed of the pointer
> > in relation to the scroll wheel on the mouse is just abou
In article <5310f9b9afris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
Richard Ashbery wrote:
> Scroll speed on my Iyonix/BB is perfect especially for long pages. It
> was painfully slow on earlier versions. I would certainly not want it
> going any slower. Unfortunately HID as suggested by John wouldn't work
> on the R
In article <5310f9b9afris...@gotadsl.co.uk>,
Richard Ashbery wrote:
> Unfortunately HID as suggested by John wouldn't work
> on the RiscPC because it was designed for the Castle Technology USB
> stack.
... and is not fully ARMv7 so has issues on a BB.
--
Chris Johnson
In article <2737921053.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
wrote:
> On most applications, including messenger Pro, the speed of the
> pointer in relation to the scroll wheel on the mouse is just about
> right, but on NetSurf it is much too fast so it's almost impossible
> to use on long we
12 matches
Mail list logo
