In message
Tony Moore wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2012, Richard Porter wrote:
>> On 12 Oct 2012 george greenfield wrote:
>>
>> > No problem accessing El Reg Software
>> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/software/ and accessing
>> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/11/ballmer_faces_uphill_bat
On 12 Oct 2012, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2012 george greenfield wrote:
>
> > No problem accessing El Reg Software
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/software/ and accessing
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/11/ballmer_faces_uphill_battle_on_windows_8_/
> > but several attempts to na
On 12 Oct 2012 george greenfield wrote:
> No problem accessing El Reg Software
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/software/ and accessing
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/11/ballmer_faces_uphill_battle_on
> _windows_8
> _/ but several attempts to navigate to 'Comments' produced a timeout
> each
No problem accessing El Reg Software
http://www.theregister.co.uk/software/ and accessing
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/10/11/ballmer_faces_uphill_battle_on_windows_8
_/ but several attempts to navigate to 'Comments' produced a timeout
each time. Selecting Menu-Navigate-Up one level also t
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 03:01:30PM +0100, Jim Nagel wrote:
> I emailed Rob and Michael a copy of the skeleton !Boot and !System
> with meaningful datestamps, plus a little explanatory textfile, all
> contained in a zip file where datestamps should be safe from the
> zealous Linux autobuilder, we
In message <06fb86dd52@nails.abbeypress.net>
Jim Nagel wrote:
>> In article <890404dd52@nails.abbeypress.net>,
>>Jim Nagel wrote:
>>> ... manually put real datestamps on the various modules etc once and
>>> for all, and on the outer shell of the !Boot and !System supplied,
> In article <890404dd52@nails.abbeypress.net>,
>Jim Nagel wrote:
>> ... manually put real datestamps on the various modules etc once and
>> for all, and on the outer shell of the !Boot and !System supplied, and
>> then instruct the autobuilder not to willynilly change the datestamps.
>> I
