On 3 Apr 2012 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> Less of the jingoism, please. RISC OS is not immune to crap mail
> clients. Additionally, this list is for discussion of NetSurf, not
> list digests.
Oops, sorry. I saw Messenger at the top and probably thought I was on
the Messenger list (even so..., you m
In article <527a841756evanal...@talktalk.net>,
wrote:
> As I said, its a matter of personal preference. Not everyone wants to
> do as you do.
> Why so evangelical?
No problem as long as you don't reply to anything. Because when you do,
you're being a nuisance to others.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:32:53AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2012 dave higton wrote:
>
> > I have to admit that I can't see the upside of digests, and I can
> > see a big downside.
>
> They might help to reduce the clutter if you have to use some poxy
> Windoze/MuckOS email client
On 3 Apr 2012 dave higton wrote:
> I have to admit that I can't see the upside of digests, and I can
> see a big downside.
They might help to reduce the clutter if you have to use some poxy
Windoze/MuckOS email client or webmail service that doesn't allow you
to do filtering, mailing lists, th
Quoting evanal...@talktalk.net:
> In article , Jim Nagel
> wrote:
> > evanal...@talktalk.net wrote on 29 Mar:
>
> > >> How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
> > >> which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
> > >> less annoying than 40 emails? J
On 3 Apr 2012 wrote:
> In article , Jim Nagel
> wrote:
>> evanal...@talktalk.net wrote on 29 Mar:
How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious.
>>>
In article , Jim Nagel
wrote:
> evanal...@talktalk.net wrote on 29 Mar:
> >> How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
> >> which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
> >> less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious.
> > It is a matter of personal pr
