In message <52782a9951evanal...@talktalk.net>
wrote:
> In article , george greenfield
> wrote:
>> I did enable it; it arrives; I tend to ignore it.
>
> Perhaps you ought to disable it?
>
You mean I ought to take control of my life? Steady on...
--
george greenfield
In article , george greenfield
wrote:
> I did enable it; it arrives; I tend to ignore it.
Perhaps you ought to disable it?
--
Barry A.
In article
<8d001425ead6b919cdaeed0ce55f3f6b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBbXkNGV10MQV13B0tTWzBeQkYBX1tcRlFV-webmailer2@s,
m0n0 wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield
> :
> > I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states
In message <8d001425ead6b919cdaeed0ce55f3f6b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFdd
qzlvf5dqunbajbbxkngv10mqv13b0ttwzbeqkybx1tcrlfv-webmail...@server02.webmailer.ho
steurope.de>
m0n0 wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield
> :
>
>> I too prefer individual
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:55 +0200 schrieb george greenfield
:
I too prefer individual messages, for same reasons as Richard states.
I tend to ignore the digest, TBH.
Sorry, I don't understand.
Digest mode can be selected by the user, right? So if you don't enable
it, you won't get
In message
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2012 Tricia Garner wrote:
>
>> How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
>> which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
>> less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious.
>
> I quite agree. With 4
Am Donnerstag, den 29.03.2012, 11:21 +0200 schrieb Richard Porter
:
With digests you have to
plough through everything, and then of course you have the problem of
how to post a reply.
You can't talk for everyone. It depends on several things: for example
personal taste
and the application
On 29 Mar 2012 Tricia Garner wrote:
> How can one lng email with all the replies in all the threads
> which people haven't snipped repeated again and again possibly be
> less annoying than 40 emails? Just curious.
I quite agree. With 40 messages properly threaded it's easy just to
ignore to
In article <5277f53bddtri...@orchid-squad.org.uk>,
Tricia Garner wrote:
> On 26 Mar, in article
> <8f18b3c749ca5517d1f25a4db079e5d1-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXVloCVQ6XFxcQ0IDWFhdQg==-webmailer2@s,
> m0n0 wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Hil
On 26 Mar, in article
<8f18b3c749ca5517d1f25a4db079e5d1-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBeX15ZVF0WXVloCVQ6XFxcQ0IDWFhdQg==-webmailer2@s,
m0n0 wrote:
> Am Montag, den 26.03.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb Tim Hill
> :
> > Why's it there? Are there still people on dialup who need it?
> Gener
10 matches
Mail list logo