On 17 Apr 2010 Michael Drake wrote:
> I'd like to hear from users of NetSurf and WebJames on the same
> machine. The old deadlocking issue should be fixed, so please let us
> know if things are now working as they should.
Yep, it seems to have been fixed. Thanks.
--
Richard Porter
In article <510960f408p...@sprie.nl>,
Paul Sprangers wrote:
> I may have missed some important news, but does this mean that the RISC
> OS build is being maintained again? That would be wonderful, indeed!
We announced that we'd release NetSurf 2.5 for RISC OS at the Wakefield
show, and that h
> Please test the latest build available from
> http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/riscos/testbuilds
I may have missed some important news, but does this mean that the RISC OS
build is being maintained again? That would be wonderful, indeed!
Kind regards,
Paul Sprangers
In article <5109526ca3t...@netsurf-browser.org>, Michael Drake
wrote:
> Please test the latest build
[Snip]
> I'd like to hear from users of NetSurf and WebJames on the same
> machine. The old deadlocking issue should be fixed, so please let us
> know if things are now working as they should.
In article <5109526ca3t...@netsurf-browser.org>,
Michael Drake wrote:
> I'd like to hear from users of NetSurf and WebJames on the same machine.
> The old deadlocking issue should be fixed, so please let us know if things
> are now working as they should.
Indeed - local pages now work sensib
Please test the latest build available from
http://www.netsurf-browser.org/downloads/riscos/testbuilds
The major change is a rewritten and more flexible cache system. It enables
us to make the most of the improvements brought about by libcss, as well
as reducing unnecessary fetches.
Please
