I seem to have stirred a hornet's nest by starting this thread! My
apologies to the hard-working developers for putting you through this!
In article <7ea8523b50.da...@david.wanadoo.fr>,
David J Worden wrote:
>> In a two-language website for a friend I have used the colour red on
>> English
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 22:05 +, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
>
> > "Disabling" CSS makes absolutely no difference to the need for both of
> > the parts of the rendering engine. So! It would seem merely a
> > 'surface' option which placates a user but makes absolute
On 14 Mar 2009 Keith Hopper wrote:
> "Disabling" CSS makes absolutely no difference to the need for both of
> the parts of the rendering engine. So! It would seem merely a
> 'surface' option which placates a user but makes absolutely no
> difference in the code which has to exist for any form of r
In article ,
Bryn Evans wrote:
[snip]
> A long while ago (2years?) I suggested that the ability for the user
> to disable CSS via a Choices selection might be a useful feature.
> Since then a lot of work has advanced things muchly and I had
> forgotten, until this problem was reported AND
In a mad moment - Richard Porter mumbled :
> On 14 Mar 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
>> ... the problem of ignored link body tags can be easily overcome _if_
>> you have control of the web site.
> Occasionally I visit sites that I don't have control of. I know it's
> dangerous but I can't resist it. :-)
In article <3c5a8d3b50.roger...@rogerarm.freeuk.com>, Roger Darlington
wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2009, Frank de Bruijn wrote:
[Snip]
> > Solution? Use absolute positioning for the images as well or redesign
> > the site (forcing people to scroll browser windows sideways is evil).
> Oh, well, I'll leav
On 14 Mar 2009 Tim Hill wrote:
> ... the problem of ignored link body tags can be easily overcome _if_
> you have control of the web site.
Occasionally I visit sites that I don't have control of. I know it's
dangerous but I can't resist it. :-)
> It's as if, like, they thought "nobody uses body
In article <7ea8523b50.da...@david.wanadoo.fr>,
David J Worden wrote:
> In a two-language website for a friend I have used the colour red on
> English pages and blue on French pages (in headings, etc., at her
> request), and so I have specified the link colour as green rather than
> the defa
On 14 Mar 2009 Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <2fdad83b50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>> What I am saying is that implementing basic html should be a starting
>> point,
> Well it was, of course. NetSurf is a web browser after all. :)
[snip]
> I doubt this part
In article <2fdad83b50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> What I am saying is that implementing basic html should be a starting
> point,
Well it was, of course. NetSurf is a web browser after all. :)
CSS was also considered early on and it would have been wrong not to do s
On 14 Mar, Richard Porter wrote in message
<2fdad83b50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>:
> On 14 Mar 2009 Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
> > I invited you to formulate a patch if you thought it so easy;...
> > Either trust me that it's not as trivial as you think, or prove
> > otherwise by implementing it.
2009/3/14 Richard Porter :
> with all other browsers in that respect. Compatibility problems arise
> when background colours are specified in html and foreground colours
> in CSS, or vice-versa. Netsurf seems to guarantee problems for any
> straight html site with a dark background colour or image
On 14 Mar 2009 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> I invited you to formulate a patch if you thought it so easy;...
> Either trust me that it's not as trivial as you think, or prove
> otherwise by implementing it.
I'm quite happy to accept your word that it's non-trivial, especially
to bolt on retrospectively
13 matches
Mail list logo
