Hi Gavin,
Suppressing graphics - yes, but selecting just part of them to surpress - I
didn't think of it before. Thanks for this idea :)
Concerning "outside department" work - the rules of GSoC are flexible enough
to allow us to do also work loosely connected with ours, and also if time
permits or
On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 May 2008 Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> X Rename .WWW.NetSurf.Log
>>> .WWW.NetSurf.OldLog
>>> That should all be one line, incase email has munged it.
On 18 May, Dr Peter Young wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Easily done. In !Run prior to the line:-
>
> > Run .!RunImage -v %*0 2>.WWW.NetSurf.Log
>
> > Add:-
>
> > X Rename .WWW.NetSurf.Log
> > .WWW.NetSurf.OldLog
On 18 May 2008 Dr Peter Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> X Rename .WWW.NetSurf.Log
>> .WWW.NetSurf.OldLog
>> That should all be one line, incase email has munged it.
> Ignorant question: Is there a typo here, or do you really mean
On 18 May 2008 "David J. Ruck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14 May 2008 Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It would be helpful if NetSurf alternated between two or three logfiles on
>> successive runs. There have been several occasions where carelessly
>> re-running NetSurf after a glit
On 14 May 2008 Simon Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be helpful if NetSurf alternated between two or three logfiles on
> successive runs. There have been several occasions where carelessly
> re-running NetSurf after a glitch has cost me a log file that I might
> otherwise have submitted
