In article <20131201222742.ga12...@parsifal.org.uk>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> Cool. A couple of things concern me about this change:
Yep, there's a few things I kept simple while I tested the validity of the
approach.
> 1) The presence of a bloom filter internal to libcss is leaked through
>
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 09:47:06PM +, Michael Drake wrote:
>
> I've just made a fairly significant optimisation to libcss's selection
> engine performance. It's now using more memory, but hopefully that's
> worth the extra speed. Please let me know how you get on with it.
Cool. A couple of
