On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:00:15 +0100,
wrote:
> Is the font chosen just the first one RUfl encounters
> (alphabetically?) that has a match?
Pretty much, yes. See:
http://source.netsurf-browser.org/trunk/rufl/src/rufl_init.c?revision=9792&view=markup#l1061
Just to explain the motivation behin
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:26:19 +
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 19:38 +0100, W P Blatchley wrote:
> > Is the font chosen just the first one RUfl encounters
> > (alphabetically?) that has a match?
>
> Pretty much, yes. See:
> http://source.netsurf-browser.org/trunk/rufl/src/rufl
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:00:21 +0100,
wrote:
So, the substitution table is just a single mapping of UCS code point ->
one (of a possible many) fonts that contain a glyph for that code point?
That's what I wrote, yes.
Sorry if what I wrote seemed redundant. I find paraphrasing a useful way
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 19:38 +0100, W P Blatchley wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:00:17 +0100,
> wrote:
>
> > No, it doesn't. It *will* match styles/weight when selecting the
> > appropriate initial font, but the substitution table is built without
> > paying attention to this information. As RI
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:00:17 +0100,
wrote:
No, it doesn't. It *will* match styles/weight when selecting the
appropriate initial font, but the substitution table is built without
paying attention to this information. As RISC OS fonts carry little
metadata about styles/weights, RUfl simply uses
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 07:33 +0100, W P Blatchley wrote:
> Now I've expanded the repertoire of UCS fonts on my system, I'm wondering
> how RUfl decides from which fonts to take glyphs for substituting when
> they're not present in the font being painted with. Could someone explain,
> please?
Now I've expanded the repertoire of UCS fonts on my system, I'm wondering
how RUfl decides from which fonts to take glyphs for substituting when
they're not present in the font being painted with. Could someone explain,
please? Is any attempt made to match styles and weights, and if so, how
