Quoth Thorsten Otto :
> On Sonntag, 24. Januar 2021 19:09:35 CET Jonas wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> I think that a compiler that defines size_t to be 32bit on a 64bit system is
> broken ;)
>
>
It's perfectly legal -- size_t is required to hold
the maximum allowed object size. It's not req
> What about when neither of these cases match?
>
> Maybe something like this would be better
>
> #else
> #if defined(_PLAN9)
> #pragma varargck nslog__log argpos 2
> #endif
> #define PRINTF(pos, args)
> #endif
Yeah, that would definitely be better.
>From cb45b499fb048c7bfcaea0744f4303b964d48469
From: Ori Bernstein
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:06:30 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for plan 9 surface, remove gcc dependency.
This adds framebuffer support for plan 9 image surfaces,
and puts macros like UNUSED and __attribute__((construc
>From be21e1a1d3ffa0b3baa073bdb4b04c80af7f7bee
From: Ori Bernstein
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:08:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] portability fixes for plan9
this fixes 3 issues:
- First off, the plan 9 C compilers don't handle GNU style varargs,
so we switch over to c99 style.
- Sec
>From 5b1b4fc13212991968bff51e98cba9da5552d983
From: Ori Bernstein
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:04:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] make source a compatible type
We pass uint32_t source as an out parameter which takes an int32_t pointer,
and the plan 9 compilers complain about this. This makes the t
This patch will probably be something we need to carry forward
in our own port, but I'm going to submit it for discussion anyways.
Currently, the plan 9 C compilers do *not* support static initialization
of bitfields, so we need to do somethign about that. We can replace them
with an enum and flag
>From 294f0ec43f6f64765d85d2e85ac9b4dafeb0e045
From: Ori Bernstein
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 18:00:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] portability fixes for plan9
Several changes are made here:
- Our compilers don't like double-declared enum tags, so we rename
them to avoid conflicts.
- We don&
patches.
Here's the first patch.
>From b02d1e93846df7f135bc8c1c82c9a2e3291480cf
From: Ori Bernstein
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:47:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] portability fixes for Plan 9
The plan 9 compilers are not gcc, and do not handle many
gcc extensions like expression templates. this change
replaces them
