On 30 Jun 2012 10:57:15 +0100, Chris Young wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:13:45 +0200, Ole wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for older spidermonkey versions (tested with
> > 1.7):
> > http://pastebin.com/XEUhYhYY
Also required, and I forgot to mention, is the inline function
JS_NewCompar
In article <20120630121057.gc11...@kyllikki.org>,
Vincent Sanders wrote:
[Explanation of the js objects and their lifetimes]
Thanks for the summary. :)
> The content *must* be given a fresh global object or the content will
> not be starting from the state the previously loaded page left
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 01:20:01PM +0200, Ole wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch tries to avoid repeated initialization of JS context,
> altough there is already one setup.
>
> Maybe an assert(JS_GetGlobalObject(cx) == NULL) would be better
> here, because js_newcompartment is not intended to be call
Hello,
this patch tries to avoid repeated initialization of JS context,
altough there is already one setup.
Maybe an assert(JS_GetGlobalObject(cx) == NULL) would be better here,
because js_newcompartment is not intended to be called twice on the same
context?
(fixes an failed assert in spi
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 02:11 +0200, Ole wrote:
> >Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 00:33 +0200 schrieb John-Mark Bell
> > :
> > The textarea_select_fragment function looks wrong to me. There seems
> > to be some confusion between character indices and byte offsets.
>
> Attached is a slightly adjuste
All,
As preparation for the move to Git tomorrow, SVN is now read-only.
Cheers,
J.
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:13:45 +0200, Ole wrote:
> This patch adds support for older spidermonkey versions (tested with
> 1.7):
> http://pastebin.com/XEUhYhYY
That seems to work with 1.5, bar a crash in js_Execute() which I can
ignore past (and don't have time to investigate atm).
> Also reme
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 02:13:45AM +0200, Ole wrote:
> This patch adds support for older spidermonkey versions (tested with
> 1.7):
> http://pastebin.com/XEUhYhYY
You should probably attach it in an email rather than slap it in a paste
bin.
B.
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:16:58 +0100, Vincent Sanders wrote:
> the spidermonkey versions i have been targetting are the c API
> versions of the 1.8 series so are simply heavy rather than obease
Ah, obviously I downloaded the wrong one.
> most probably because the JSAPI native calling function spec
