for multi-plugin use cases as well. Therefore, we will
modify our extensions by using extension framework.
Thanks,
Ying
From: Rajaram Mallya [mailto:rajarammal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:56 AM
To: Ying Liu (yinliu2)
Cc: Dan Wendlandt; Somik Behera; Troy; Salvatore
t;tenants"
in portprofile extension, I assume the first URI should be the one we
used to access portprofile resources. Did I miss something here?
Best,
Ying
From: Rajaram Mallya [mailto:rajarammal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 10:56 AM
To: Ying Liu (yinliu2)
Cc: Da
xample, we will have
parent_resource = dict(member_name="tenant",
collection_name="CSCO/tenants")
Best,
Ying
From: Rajaram Mallya [mailto:rajarammal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 7:01 PM
To: Ying Liu (yinliu2)
Cc: Dan Wendlandt; Somik Behera; Troy; Salvatore Or
Hi Salvatore,
I agree with you and Dan on data extension. It provides flexibility can
enrich core resources' attributes.
Regarding to the possible clashes among different plug-ins, Jorge has
proposed using Vendor ID and alias. Here is his proposal: (having both
xml and json example)
Ad
Hi Tyler,
/v0.1/extensions works for me.
You can check your quantum.conf file to see whether the extension is
configured or not.
BTW, this extension framework is not merged with quantum yet. You need
to directly check out Santosh's branch to use /v0.1/extensions
Best,
Ying
> -Original Messa
Hi Santhosh and Salvatore,
I saw api_extensions merge request is still pending.
Are there any fixes going on?
Best,
Ying
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler Smith -X (tylesmit)
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:00 PM
> To: Ying Liu (yinliu2)
> Cc: netstack@list
hear from others.
We can discuss about this in our next meeting.
Best,
Ying
From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:01 PM
To: Salvatore Orlando
Cc: Ying Liu (yinliu2); Santhosh Kumar M; netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Netstack] [
Hi Salvatore and Dan,
Thanks for the great discussion. (Apologize for joining the discussion
late. My outlook filter has some problem recently. First several
messages on this thread went to a wrong folder.)
I prefer for having both mechanism available. That means, Plugin can
decide whether
Hi Salvatore,
Just want to double check with you. Vendor specific extension will not
be added into this API documentation, right?
If needed, we can provide that part. Otherwise, we will keep it within
our document.
Best,
Ying
From: netstack-bounces+yinliu2=cisco@lists.launchpad.n
Hi Dan and Salvatore,
Sure. We can put that in the appendixes.
Best,
Ying
From: Salvatore Orlando [mailto:salvatore.orla...@eu.citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 1:58 AM
To: Dan Wendlandt; Ying Liu (yinliu2)
Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: RE: [Netstack
Hi Salvatore,
Thanks for bring up this discussion.
Regarding to Quantum API v1.1, we could add some improvements on the API
extensions. Here are something we can add:
1. Having mechanism to verify and enforce vendor's ID used by API
extension.
2. Under the extension/ directory,
Hi Salvatore,
Great work.
I will review it and get back to you shortly.
Best,
Ying
From: netstack-bounces+yinliu2=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:netstack-bounces+yinliu2=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Dan Wendlandt
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 8:51 AM
To: Sa
Hi Brad,
I agree with you.
For extension framework, its functionality only provides us mechanism to
get extended attributes into request data, which is done as the example
illustrated. However, to pass the data to the plugin for further
processing, we need either modify existing action's parse_re
d earlier. What do you think?
Thanks
Ying
From: netstack-bounces+yinliu2=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:netstack-bounces+yinliu2=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Ying Liu (yinliu2)
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:51 AM
To: Salvatore Orlando; netstack@lists.launchpad.
it to pass any data in. What we need to enforce is the
prefix for the attribute's name, which needs to that vendor's ID.
Best,
Ying
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Hall [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:58 AM
> To: Salvatore Orlando
&g
l [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 10:58 AM
> To: Salvatore Orlando
> Cc: Ying Liu (yinliu2); Dan Wendlandt; netstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Netstack] Data extensions in quantum
>
> Replies inline..
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:54 AM
16 matches
Mail list logo
