[Netstack] FW: Change in openstack/quantum[master]: bug/801227 API should support paginated collections

2012-01-24 Thread Salvatore Orlando
2 17:26 To: Salvatore Orlando Cc: Aaron Lee Subject: Re: Change in openstack/quantum[master]: bug/801227 API should support paginated collections From: Aaron Lee [mailto:aaron@rackspace.com<mailto:aaron@rackspace.com>] Sent: 24 January 2012 16:23 To: Salvatore Orlando Cc: Dan Wendlandt Sub

[Netstack] Changes to Quantum Plugin Interface in Essex 3

2012-01-25 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, As many of you are already aware of, we introduced some changes in the Quantum plugin interface beginning with Essex-3 milestone, due to be released later this week. These changes, which have been introduced in order to support filters in the Quantum API, affect the get_all_network and get

Re: [Netstack] where did the common folder go?

2012-02-02 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi guys, In my development environment I do things slightly differently, as I try not to use packaged software, since I might end up doing changes in both quantum and python-quantumclient (quantum relies on its code now). I just have both repositories and when launching quantum (or unit tests) I

[Netstack] Unit tests in quantum-pythonclient

2012-02-02 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi people of the network, I hope you are all having a great bug squashing day (even if most of you are sleeping now)! I see that, as expected, client-side tests have been moved to python-quantumclient. However, I did not see a run_tests.py neither a run_tests.sh in the client repository. Althou

[Netstack] Quantum packaging availability

2012-03-06 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, I'm trying to list all the distros where quantum and python-quantumclient are available. To the best of my knowledge the list is the following: * Ubuntu Precise (12.04) * Debian wheezy/unstable * Fedora Core 17 Alpha Is this list wrong? Am I missing some distros?

Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans

2012-03-13 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Dan, I think the distinction between ‘shiny’ and ‘community’ is just fantastic! I would like to join Dan in stressing the important of the ‘community’ list, adding that most of the things in the list below are probably “conditio sine qua non” for getting into core. During the Folsom release cyc

Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans

2012-03-21 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi Netstackers, It's good to see so many people contributing to this discussion. I particularly appreciate the fact that a lot of the contributors to this thread are not among the 'usual' Quantum faces... this surely means the community is growing! It is my opinion that during Folsom we should

Re: [Netstack] Enabling Quantum AuthN

2012-03-22 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, One of the differences between nova-manage and nova is that the former is a 'service provider' tool, whereas the latter is a 'tenant' tool. For several tasks, nova-manage does even use the API at all. For instance when it creates a network, it just imports the network manager class and inv

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Help on Quantum installation through DevStack (openvswitch error) !!

2012-03-22 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Openvswitch-common is a dependency for openvswitch-switch. It should be downloaded and installed automatically when installing openvswitch-switch. Salvatore From: netstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.

Re: [Netstack] Enabling Quantum AuthN

2012-03-22 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Replies inline Cheers, Salvatore > -Original Message- > From: Deepak Garg [mailto:deepakgarg.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 March 2012 10:43 > To: Salvatore Orlando > Cc: Jason Kölker; netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: Re: [Netstack] Enabling Quantum AuthN >

Re: [Netstack] Enabling Quantum AuthN

2012-04-01 Thread Salvatore Orlando
e' user to operate on their networks. For instance, service user 'nova' will be allowed to create ports and plug interface into user 'foo' networks only if 'foo' explicitly allows it. Salvatore From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: 01 April 2012

Re: [Netstack] Quantum CLI Auth bp

2012-04-01 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Deepak, Thanks for submitting this blueprint. I think it looks very good, and I have only a couple of minor points: 1) --endpoint_url: don't we have already a mechanism for specifying the quantum service uri? 2) 401 error: I think it should include the case of invalid credentials too, leaving

Re: [Netstack] Closing down this list.

2012-04-24 Thread Salvatore Orlando
One of the original purposes of the Netstack mailing list was not to clutter the Openstack mailing list with design and development discussions. Now that Quantum is going into core for Folsom it makes sense to merge with the main mailing list. Having two separate mailing lists started to become s

Re: [Netstack] OVS+iptables

2012-05-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi Roman! It seems that iptables and open vswitch do not play nicely together, in particular when the rules need to be applied directly on the VIF ports. As discussed in the "limitations" section of the plugin's documentation: http://openvswitch.org/openstack/documentation/ For the blueprint yo

Re: [Netstack] OVS+iptables

2012-05-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Re-sending as it seems that for some reason the message was not delivered to the list. Salvatore > -Original Message- > From: Salvatore Orlando > Sent: 16 May 2012 16:46 > To: Roman Sokolkov; netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: RE: [Netstack] OVS+iptables > &

[Netstack] Test message

2012-05-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Apologies for sending a pointless message to the list. I was under the impression that I could not send messages anymore. Salvatore -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~netstack Post to : netstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~netstack More help : https://help.

Re: [Netstack] proposing gary kotton for quantum-core

2012-06-04 Thread Salvatore Orlando
+1 Salvatore On 4 June 2012 19:43, Debo~ Dutta wrote: > +1000 > > On Jun 4, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Gary (garyk on IRC) has been doing a lot of great work reviewing and > contributing code to Quantum, so I'd like to propose him as a core member. > > If you are

Re: [Netstack] proposing Yong Sheng Gong for quantum-core

2012-06-05 Thread Salvatore Orlando
+1 Salvatore Il giorno 05/giu/2012 07:57, "hitesh wadekar" ha scritto: > Gary and Yong have really done a great work within in a short time. I am > still learning from them. > > Great to see you guys for core member. > > +1 from me. > > Thanks, > Hitesh > > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Gar

[Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

2012-06-11 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, During our last project meeting there was some interest in introducing "review days" for Quantum core devs. I see multiple benefits in this approach: 1) Contributors would know which core member the need to contact on a given days for soliciting a review for their patches 2) Predictable code

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

2012-06-11 Thread Salvatore Orlando
As the link to the wiki page is now buried deep in this thread, here it is again: http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum/ReviewDays Weekend days have been added on GaryK's request! Salvatore On 11 June 2012 16:51, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Sal

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Provider Networks extension advice (was Re: question on get_network_details api call)

2012-06-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
While I understand the reasons for which the RequestExtensions scheme might be preferred over the resource extension one, I was wondering whether assigning namespaces to attributes could be a solution to the XML issue. This would clearly separate "core" attributes from extended ones. Bob, can you

Re: [Netstack] ovs agent Python 2.4 support

2012-06-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Installing a new python subsystem is never an operation which should be taken lightly, especially when is performed on dom0, which is more an appliance rather than a standard linux box. I wonder how can we guarantee that such a change won't affect XS/XCP functionality, at least for nova purposes. W

Re: [Netstack] V2 IP Address Allocations

2012-06-21 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, I am not entirely sure I've got this thread right - so I apologize in advance for any non sense. It seems it started with Gary asking whether we could restructure the request format for POST /v2/ports, but then it seems the discussion is now focused on how we should search for IPs. I understan

Re: [Netstack] V2 IP Address Allocations

2012-06-21 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Replies inline! Have a good day, Salvatore On 21 June 2012 12:56, Gary Kotton wrote: > On 06/21/2012 12:27 PM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am not entirely sure I've got this thread right - so I apologize in >> advance for any non sense. &

Re: [Netstack] V2 IP Address Allocations

2012-06-21 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Joining Dan in the late-night fun of doing emails :) Replies inline. Salvatore On 21 June 2012 23:59, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jason Kölker > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 14:56 +0300, Gary Kotton wrote: >> > > However, I would probably use a slightly dif

Re: [Netstack] requirements for quantum plugins

2012-06-29 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hello Dan & netstack people, replies inline. On 29 June 2012 07:50, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Hi folks, > > Ryota from NEC sent an email to the list earlier tonight about pushing > their NEC Quantum plugin (currently hosted outside of the main Quantum > repo), into the main Quantum repo. As some

Re: [Netstack] requirements for quantum plugins

2012-06-29 Thread Salvatore Orlando
>> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto: >> netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of >> *Salvatore >> Orlando >> *Sent:* Friday, June 29, 2012 12:54 AM >> *To:* Dan Wendlandt &g

Re: [Netstack] About Quantum Client/CLI: security group support

2012-07-02 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, It is my opinion that the client-side blueprint Yong is referring to, which I believe is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-client-security-groups, is paired by the following server-side blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-security-groups, whic

Re: [Netstack] Devstack and Quantum DHCP agent

2012-07-05 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Thanks Gary! I think the way in which you've added devstack support for Quantum DHCP makes sense. I will try it later this afternoon and give you my feedback. Regards, Salvatore On 5 July 2012 14:21, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > I have updated the wiki written by Aaron. This now includes instruc

Re: [Netstack] DHCP Agent

2012-07-08 Thread Salvatore Orlando
At a first glance (meaning that I've not looked in detail at the code), I would say that this kind of situations will be much more likely to happen once we start attaching different services to Quantum ports. I reckon this is an example of incompatibility between the dnsmasq-based plugin/driver for

[Netstack] [Quantum] Starting a discussion on the official spec for v2 API

2012-07-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hello people of Quantum! As the Folsom release approaches, it is time to gather together and finalize the specification for the v2 API, so that the Openstack-doc team might cast it in stone for the sake of the Quantum users! In order to make this happen, it looks like there are just a few bits tha

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Starting a discussion on the official spec for v2 API

2012-07-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
chpad.net] On > > Behalf Of Gary Kotton > > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:33 AM > > To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net > > Subject: Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Starting a discussion on the official > spec > > for v2 API > > > > On 07/17/2012 10:28 AM, Salvatore Or

Re: [Netstack] [DB] Create Quantum DB

2012-07-25 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Nicolas, Quantum and its plugins do not have yet schema versioning. If you've messed up the DB and dropped it, just create the schema in mysql. Quantum (or to be more precise sqlAlchemy) will recreate the tables for you. The name of the db for the OVS plugin is ovs_quantum. DB name can differ from

Re: [Netstack] [DB] Create Quantum DB

2012-07-25 Thread Salvatore Orlando
fter that :/ > > Thanks > > --- Nicolas > > Le Wed Jul 25 15:23:28 2012, Salvatore Orlando a écrit : > >> Nicolas, >> >> Quantum and its plugins do not have yet schema versioning. >> If you've messed up the DB and dropped it, just create the schema i

Re: [Netstack] [DB] Create Quantum DB

2012-07-25 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I've just tried to reproduce your condition by dropping all the tables on the ovs_quantum db and then relaunching quantum-server, quantum-agent, and quantum-dhcp. The tables were successfully recreated. The only advice I can give is to 1) verify no table actually appears when you do "show tables"

Re: [Netstack] [DB] Create Quantum DB

2012-07-25 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I admin I have never seen anything like this. The issue must then be either in configure_db or register_models, both in db/api.py, even if I would have expected to see "Database Registration Exception" in the logs. However, I cannot say what's the root cause for the issue - Quantum, sqlAlchemy, or

Re: [Netstack] [Blueprint quantum-l3-fwd-nat] Nova-equivalent Quantum L3 Forwarding, NAT, and Floating-IP Extension

2012-07-31 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi Bill, all Openstack project use the following tools: - launchpad for tracking bug and specifications - github for source code (github.com/openstack) - gerrit for code review (review.openstack.org) For the blueprint you're referring to, there isn't yet code available (there will be soon). Sever

Re: [Netstack] [openstack-dev] [Quantum] Proposing Mark McClain & Nachi Ueno for core dev

2012-08-16 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I reckon my +1 is unnecessary at this stage as Mark has votes from more than 50% of the core dev team. So... congratulations Mark! Salvatore On 16 August 2012 09:49, Gary Kotton wrote: > +1 for Mark > > In favor of voting Nachi in in the near future. > > > On 08/16/2012 08:22 AM, Yong Sheng G

<    1   2